Hello all, Jeri is correct on the URL for filing or reading comments: http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html A good "Proceedings" number for new comments would be 02-98, the Docket number. 73, Mike W2AG
Hello LF-Group, I have filed my comments to the proposal electronically. You can review it (and other comments) by opening the following URL: http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html then click on the fie
<< Do you think it would be useful to send this type of comment directly to the FCC, or would it be better to do it via AMRAD/LWCA/ARRL etc? >> My personal assessment of the situation is that it woul
Dear Andre, LF Group, Regarding ERP and so on, significant points that can be drawn from European experience on LF are: Measurements by several people have shown that the efficiencies achieved by typ
<< If the rules as proposed (1 Watt EIRP, 100 Watt PEP) becomes true, it might be very difficult to find any future partner stations for transatlantic QSOs. >> I also join Andre' in urging internatio
Hello LF-Friends, this time especially those from Europe, in my previous mail I gave some comments about the U.S. FCC's Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) Thanks again and 73 André N4ICK
Hello LF-Friends, this time especially those from Europe, in my previous mail I gave some comments about the U.S. FCC's Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) on the allocation of the LF band 135.7 -
