Without time travel the nature of a transmission is unchanged by its later detection. Exactly how does a transmission on a permitted frequency in one country become offensive if its later reception i
[email protected] wrote: It's not the initial transmission that commits the offense. It's the "acknowledgement" which is the problem; not because it's on a different frequency, but because it constitu
It's not the initial transmission that commits the offense. It's the "acknowledgement" which is the problem; not because it's on a different frequency, but because it constitutes communication with
Hi All, Further to Mike's comments, it is also useful to appreciate the strength supplied by our not inconsiderable sympathy among the commercial interests lobbying the regulators. From my personal e
Who is the sad soul who believes that the rules are made by our "elected representatives". They only vote on legislation generated by "sybil serpents" who are often working from briefs originating fr
I was involved with negotiations between the RSGB and the UK licensing authority for many years, both as a volunteer and a member of staff, and agree entirely with Scott's comments. My experience is
EErrrrrmmmmm! It would help those of us who engage in debate if others who reply do so in a way that does not result in a distortion of the point being made by the insertion of comments within the bo
Regardless of appellations used in the licence, a station transmitting for pure amateur pleasure with no professional/commercial intent is by all standards of English usage... an "amateur radio stat
