Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+WOLF\s+\-\s+ready\s+to\s+RX\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+WOLF\s+\-\s+ready\s+to\s+RX\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: RE: WOLF - ready to RX (score: 1): Author: Piotr Mynarski <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:42:42 +0200; Success!!! Recalibrated the sound card as suggested and BINGO - decode on first try! 2009-09-10 21:15:29 >WOLF10 -r 8100.257 -f 1000 -t 1 -w 0.0000 t: 24 f:-0.339 a:-1.5 dp: 85.6 ci: 7 cj:272 M0BMU I; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00040.html (11,490 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: RE: WOLF - ready to RX (score: 1): Author: Piotr Mynarski <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:01:13 +0200; Dear Jim, Roger, LF Group, The M0BMU WOLF beacon is now running on 503.500kHz - I don't know what frequency G7NKS plans to be on , but would suggest about 100Hz spacing. If you are at reasonably clo; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00094.html (12,414 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re: RE: WOLF - ready to RX (score: 1): Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:57:50 +0100; John, Roger & Group, It took me several attempts to calibrate the sound card but OK now. Gary - G4WGT. 2009-09-10 20:30:17 >WOLF10 -r 7985.608 -f 800 -t 3.0 -w 0.0000 -ut 20:30:41 f:-2.791 a:-1.0 dp:; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00141.html (15,298 bytes)
4. LF: Re: RE: WOLF - ready to RX (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:10:36 +0100; Dear Jim, Roger, LF Group, The M0BMU WOLF beacon is now running on 503.500kHz - I don't know what frequency G7NKS plans to be on , but would suggest about 100Hz spacing. If you are at reasonably clos; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00348.html (11,629 bytes)
5. Re: LF: Re: RE: WOLF - ready to RX (score: 1): Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:56:28 +0100; Roger Lapthorn wrote: Well, easy for some (I can see) but NOT for me. What am I doing wrong? 19:19:11 >WOLF RESTARTED And STILL no decode even though Jim is clear and strong on the waterfall. 73s Ro; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00441.html (13,716 bytes)
6. Re: LF: Re: RE: WOLF - ready to RX (score: 1): Author: Piotr Mynarski <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:31:02 +0200; Hi Piotr, The first line is: 2009-09-10 19:15:05 >WOLF10 -r 8000 -f 987 -t 20 -w 0.0000 The frequency of 987Hz is where (on my RX) Jim's signal peaks. 73s Roger G3XBM Hi Roger, ok, the sampling rate; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00529.html (11,499 bytes)
7. Re: LF: Re: RE: WOLF - ready to RX (score: 1): Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:52:44 +0100; Thanks for this John. I am not one to give up easily, HI, so will keep trying until it's sorted. Unfortunately I have to catch a plane very early tomorrow morning so my efforts for tonight must stop; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00558.html (15,149 bytes)
8. Re: LF: Re: RE: WOLF - ready to RX (score: 1): Author: Piotr Mynarski <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:45:45 +0200; Roger Lapthorn wrote: Well, easy for some (I can see) but NOT for me. What am I doing wrong? 19:19:11 >WOLF RESTARTED And STILL no decode even though Jim is clear and strong on the waterfall. 73s Rog; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00605.html (11,736 bytes)
9. Re: LF: Re: RE: WOLF - ready to RX (score: 1): Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:17:36 +0100; Success!!! Recalibrated the sound card as suggested and BINGO - decode on first try! 2009-09-10 21:15:29 >WOLF10 -r 8100.257 -f 1000 -t 1 -w 0.0000 t: 24 f:-0.339 a:-1.5 dp: 85.6 ci: 7 cj:272 M0BMU; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00658.html (12,472 bytes)
10. Re: LF: Re: RE: WOLF - ready to RX (score: 1): Author: John P-G <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:56:58 +0000; That's good! Once it's sorted we need some real QRPp signals or real DX to try it with. Incidentally, WSPR I found exceedingly easy on this PC - perhaps I was lucky. That probably bodes well, in res; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00738.html (11,970 bytes)
11. Re: LF: Re: RE: WOLF - ready to RX (score: 1): Author: John P-G <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:32:02 +0000; Great news! Now we need some real QRPp to test this mode with - it's supposed to be able to average over many frames to pull a decode out of the noise, but at present Jim's signal is too strong - it; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00758.html (11,535 bytes)
12. Re: LF: Re: RE: WOLF - ready to RX (score: 1): Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:11:17 +0100; Well, easy for some (I can see) but NOT for me. What am I doing wrong? 19:19:11 >WOLF RESTARTED t: 24 f: 0.367 a:-0.5 dp: 85.8 ci: 1 cj: 0 1STCG6J2X7EUEWZ ? t: 48 f: 0.366 a:-0.4 dp: 85.7 ci: 2 cj; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00790.html (17,147 bytes)
13. Re: LF: Re: RE: WOLF - ready to RX (score: 1): Author: John P-G <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:38:55 +0000; Roger, Unfortunately I don't think I can help, as I'm a total novice at WOLF, so can't really come up with any quick fixes! All I did was set the centre frequency to match the USB tuning offset - tu; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00843.html (12,949 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]