Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+WE2XGR\/2\s+QRSS10\s+\/\s+CW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+WE2XGR\/2\s+QRSS10\s+\/\s+CW\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: RE: WE2XGR/2 QRSS10 / CW (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:23:39 -0500; Gary Okay. How about 505.240? I have to be below 505.250 to avoid the XSH gang that 'owns' 505.25 - 505.27 kHz for their QRSS activity. Jay Jay, That frequency will only be about 20Hz above one of th; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-11/msg00049.html (10,686 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: RE: WE2XGR/2 QRSS10 / CW (score: 1): Author: "Warren Ziegler" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:40:58 -0500; Jay and the list, Actually WD2XSH group uses 505.200 - 505.250 for QRSS, 505.250-505.270 was suggested for the XGR group. In practice it shouldn't make a difference since only 1 of the XSH group ever; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-11/msg00062.html (13,243 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re: RE: WE2XGR/2 QRSS10 / CW (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:48:32 -0500; Warren Actually, not according to the info on 500kc.com ... http://www.500kc.com/stations_frequency.htm That's what I went by. What gives? Jay -- Original Message -- From: "Warren Ziegler" <wd2xgj@gm; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-11/msg00063.html (12,418 bytes)
4. Re: LF: Re: RE: WE2XGR/2 QRSS10 / CW (score: 1): Author: Mike WE0H <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:36:38 -0600; Not me, my amp is old being a 1976 design but my Kenwood is 1980's technology...hi hi...I think my transverter was built in 2007? I am running a QRSS-1 signal for Pat right now (0736z) on 507.90kc. A; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-11/msg00379.html (12,129 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]