Re: LF: Re: RE: WE2XGR/2 QRSS10 / CW

[Mike WE0H <we0h@yahoo.com>]

Not me, my amp is old being a 1976 design but my Kenwood is 1980's 
technology...hi hi...I think my transverter was built in 2007?
I am running a QRSS-1 signal for Pat right now (0736z) on 507.90kc. Any 
of you guys want to use what the admin guy says I should be using,
go ahead & use it as I go anywhere in the band where I see an opening. I 
tend to stay above 506.50kc usually but not always...hi hi...
Mike
WE0H
/16


Warren  wrote:
> Jay and the list,
>
>    Actually WD2XSH group uses 505.200 - 505.250 for QRSS,
> 505.250-505.270 was suggested for the XGR group.
>
> In practice it shouldn't make a difference since only 1 of the XSH
> group ever uses QRSS and then only rarely.
> (The rest of the WD2XSH group is constitutionally opposed to using any
> technology developed after WWII ! )
>
> 73 Warren K2ORS
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 3:23 PM,  Jay wrote:
>   
> > Gary
> >
> > Okay. How about 505.240? I have to be below 505.250 to avoid the XSH gang
> > that 'owns' 505.25 - 505.27 kHz for their QRSS activity.
> >
> > Jay
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary - G4WGT" 
> >
> >     
> > > Jay,
> > >
> > > That frequency will only be about 20Hz above one of the EU beacons, have a
> > > look at my   grabber to see the 3 or 4 beacons there.
> > >
> > > http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor/grabber2.html
> > >
> > > If there is a RTTY signal at about 505.800KHz ignore it, just an image.
> > >
> > > 73
> > >
> > > Gary - G4WGT.