Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+POOR\s+ANTENNAS\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 18:20:05 +0100
Direct emails AGREE but Public disclosures seem to have NO Opinion !!!!!!!!!! What's new !! g3kev -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] mal hamilton To: [email protected] rsgb
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-08/msg00164.html (12,763 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 17:41:46 +0200
..about and older subject, but this is what i mean about QRN in UK and EU. Just taken that screenshot: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/QRN_UK_EU.png 73, Stefan/DK7FC
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-08/msg00306.html (9,663 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS (score: 1)
Author: Steinar Aanesland <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:38:53 +0100
Hummmm, a lot of crap is slipping through. I have to fine-tuning the spam filter again :( LA5VNA Steinar loc:JO59jq Den 18.02.2013 19:23, skrev mal hamilton:
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00021.html (12,457 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:00:32 +0000
Ken That seems to be the problem in merry old England. Even if you have the space, neighbours do not want you to put up an antenna and neither does the planing dept. In Scotland and Ireland there is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00028.html (26,632 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:53:22 +0000 (GMT)
Roger and group Mal is right next stop the Shetlands, however.... I have come to the conclusion that yes a large capture antenna (Marconi etc) will out perform frame ants and active antennas for rece
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00057.html (22,793 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:12:58 +0100
May be , may be not Mal The system is reading the s/n at the Rx and not the field strength ........ depends on the local noise level , rst 159 or 599 , carrier still S9 , 1= qrm 5= no qrm From: g3kev
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00096.html (11,876 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:24:48 +0000 (GMT)
Ken That seems to be the problem in merry old England. Even if you have the space, neighbours do not want you to put up an antenna and neither does the planing dept. In Scotland and Ireland there is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00167.html (30,889 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:37:48 +0100
So wspr is totally dependent on the Receive operator ? and a vy quiet location. I thought the whole idea was to overcome this problem Mal.. well , basically as long as the signal to noise ratio is be
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00188.html (17,175 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:43:59 +0100
Mal is back to his full entertaining performance! Woooow, here we go! BTW i never read someone was writing "I am an expert". 73, Stefan/DK7FC PS: Back to WSPR-15 on LF for the night. Conds seems to b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00264.html (12,424 bytes)

10. LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:12:59 +0100
Example I am receiving PA3EGO + 2dB another UK stn is showing -22 at a shorter distance. A difference of 24 dB and this station says he is an Expert!! -- Original Message -- From: [email protected]
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00296.html (10,411 bytes)

11. RE: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS (score: 1)
Author: "Ken" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:37:18 +0100
Hi Mal. It would be very nice to have a 60ft vertical, you would not obtain permission where I live, 3m is the max without planning permission. Ken M0KHW From: owner- [email protected] [ma
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00449.html (23,163 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:25:35 +0000
May be , may be not  Mal   The system is  reading  the  s/n   at the  Rx   and  not the   field  strength ........  depends on the  local  noise level ,   rst   159  or  599  , carrier  still  S9  ,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00565.html (14,407 bytes)

13. Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:37:20 +0100
Ken That seems to be the problem in merry old England. Even if you have the space, neighbours do not want you to put up an antenna and neither does the planing dept. In Scotland and Ireland there is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00607.html (24,654 bytes)

14. Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:37:57 +0100
I WOUD MOVE -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Roger Lapthorn To: [email protected] [email protected] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 5:25 PM Subject: Re: LF:
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00690.html (14,768 bytes)

15. Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:25:24 +0100
Graham It is all inter related. But a few fundamentals are necessary. If it is so bad with for instance a 24 dB disadvantage I would MOVE or pack it in. Too many excuses are used, the amateur has eno
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00734.html (13,990 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu