Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS

["mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>]

I WOUD MOVE

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Roger Lapthorn

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 5:25 PM

Subject: Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS

Quite so Graham.

Many are plagued by unbelievable noise levels these days. It would be too much to expect Mal to try to empathise and suggest helpful ways of mitigating this.

I just wonder how Mal would fare living in an urban semi with a 40 foot garden like mine?

73s

Roger G3XBM

On 18 February 2013 17:01, Graham <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:

May be , may be not  Mal

 

The system is  reading  the  s/n   at the  Rx   and  not the   field  strength ........  depends on the  local  noise level ,   rst   159  or  599  , carrier  still  S9  ,   1= qrm     5= no  qrm

From: mal hamilton

Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 4:49 PM

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Subject: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS

Example

I am receiving PA3EGO + 2dB another UK stn is showing -22 at a shorter distance. A difference of 24 dB

and this station says he is an Expert!!

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: mal hamilton

To: rsgb

Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 4:42 PM

Subject: LF: POOR ANTENNAS

MF

One thing the wspr DB shows is how poor some Receivers/Antennas are comparing like with like approximately same distances from Transmitter.

 

g3kev

 

--

http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/
http://qss2.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm