Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS

from [Graham] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS
From: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:01:44 -0000
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <01d001ce0df7$ec018990$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References: <01c201ce0df6$fca68350$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <01d001ce0df7$ec018990$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
May be , may be not  Mal
 
The system is  reading  the  s/n   at the  Rx   and  not the   field  strength ........  depends on the  local  noise level ,   rst   159  or  599  , carrier  still  S9  ,   1= qrm     5= no  qrm
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 4:49 PM
Subject: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS

Example
I am receiving PA3EGO + 2dB another UK stn is showing -22 at a shorter distance. A difference of 24 dB
and this station says he is an Expert!!
 
 
----- Original Message -----
To: rsgb
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 4:42 PM
Subject: LF: POOR ANTENNAS

MF
One thing the wspr DB shows is how poor some Receivers/Antennas are comparing like with like approximately same distances from Transmitter.
 
g3kev
 
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  LF: VK1DSH FREQ, mal hamilton
Next by Date:  LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS, mal hamilton
Previous by Thread:  LF: Re: Re: POOR ANTENNAS, mal hamilton
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS, Roger Lapthorn
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]