Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS

from [Roger Lapthorn] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS
From: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:25:35 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=EB8sa1IXOBzE7G/F7nNA7wYC6dc1xZtoj2eD4xzgtdE=; b=jeYzoZIKXVcB/C7RkxqYEd6KJaSYXE81+3J+9dOhAr+tK0svYsB+JJcZSNhOHhr5CC 0l/JTW7gCySaDfzTbK3hQAcz7igRM2OS72hkVrsu+H65eAdvs+WJjy0pPpShXxu/vAYY 9vXPbeozOyZjXCvPIoHtbL3tvvwUaRDRLsuVvYiHwSXs94ACYzfdHftksrnkyEAJgZ6K utHhuH+VPIr2awRuuoxj2QEAyeUOh2+eKqz6/F4Bf7qnNpiZr93IY+FI1/SV79eegdMm BmCECkv6aun+gGw1mKqUnCyLsE9xZrKuEm1WXejLOD8I+6hX461FVRY6CzOx/rItmu6y p8pQ==
In-reply-to: <3751D15C489E45289657A49A3266CF42@AGB>
References: <01c201ce0df6$fca68350$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <01d001ce0df7$ec018990$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <3751D15C489E45289657A49A3266CF42@AGB>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Quite so Graham.

Many are plagued by unbelievable noise levels these days. It would be too much to expect Mal to try to empathise and suggest helpful ways of mitigating this.

I just wonder how Mal would fare living in an urban semi with a 40 foot garden like mine?

73s
Roger G3XBM


On 18 February 2013 17:01, Graham <[email protected]> wrote:
May be , may be not  Mal
 
The system is  reading  the  s/n   at the  Rx   and  not the   field  strength ........  depends on the  local  noise level ,   rst   159  or  599  , carrier  still  S9  ,   1= qrm     5= no  qrm
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 4:49 PM
Subject: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS

Example
I am receiving PA3EGO + 2dB another UK stn is showing -22 at a shorter distance. A difference of 24 dB
and this station says he is an Expert!!
 
 
----- Original Message -----
To: rsgb
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 4:42 PM
Subject: LF: POOR ANTENNAS

MF
One thing the wspr DB shows is how poor some Receivers/Antennas are comparing like with like approximately same distances from Transmitter.
 
g3kev
 



--
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  LF: POOR ANTENNAS, mal hamilton
Next by Date:  Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS, mal hamilton
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS, Graham
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS, mal hamilton
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]