Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Hall\s+Effect\s+for\s+Over\-current\s+shutdown\?\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: Hall Effect for Over-current shutdown? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 17:42:04 +0200
Hi Warren, What is the value of the shunt resistor? 73, Stefan Am 09.04.2013 17:00, schrieb Warren Ziegler: Hi Stefan, I think you are advocating higher voltage and lower current to decrease loss in
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00009.html (13,276 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: Hall Effect for Over-current shutdown? (score: 1)
Author: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 15:47:29 -0400
Clemens,   Thank you! Warren On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Clemens Paul <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Warren, I know a German OM (RF engineer) who has recently implemented a hall sensor for overcurrent
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00017.html (17,069 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: Hall Effect for Over-current shutdown? (score: 1)
Author: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 15:07:09 -0400
Ah interesting problem Warren.... why is it over-current?? if it is over-current because a high voltage has welded/melted a short between drain and source, then the protection wont help ....high cur
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00024.html (14,586 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: Hall Effect for Over-current shutdown? (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 20:39:27 +0100
Ah yes that is Class D and can go that way if mis-matched......that is a lot of power in a sensing resistor! I guess a Hall effect device or even a temp sensor would do that job. I think in over curr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00025.html (16,746 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: Hall Effect for Over-current shutdown? (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 18:46:20 +0200
Hi Warren, Indeed it requires a few milliseconds (the small reed relay contacts can switch at one or two hundred Hertz) but you don't need to shut off the MOSFET within a few thousand cycles of the c
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00033.html (23,688 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: Hall Effect for Over-current shutdown? (score: 1)
Author: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 11:01:31 -0400
Hello Warren,   that should be possible, I have used a A1302 Hall sensor as a "no contact" >100A current monitor. The sensor was just some mm away from the wire and was calibrated once using a (expe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00070.html (19,854 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: Hall Effect for Over-current shutdown? (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 22:01:34 +0100
Hi Wolf I cant remember the ratings now but breaking 18A+ might be a bit cruel :-)) It would probably need more than a tap with a pencil to unstick it ! Alan G3NYK -- Original Message -- From: dl4yhf
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00071.html (19,412 bytes)

8. RE: LF: Re: Hall Effect for Over-current shutdown? (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 21:42:37 +0200
Hi Warren, I know a German OM (RF engineer) who has recently implemented a hall sensor for overcurrent shutdown for his home built 1KW short wave FET PA successfully. I will ask him if he is willing
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00165.html (14,475 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: Hall Effect for Over-current shutdown? (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 22:18:52 +0200
.. or wind a few turns of fat copper wire around a 'reed relay' contact tube. Virtually no voltage loss then. I used this for a power supply, but it would work for the DC current feed inside a PA as
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00171.html (18,839 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Re: Hall Effect for Over-current shutdown? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 14:27:22 +0200
Hi Warren, Instead of spending to much effort to the current sensing my advice is to use other FETs. A 500 V FET at 30 V supply voltage is a heavy waste of power in the on resistance. For 30 V and a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00178.html (17,139 bytes)

11. Re: LF: Re: Hall Effect for Over-current shutdown? (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 19:00:04 +0200
Hi Alan, Of course when the reed switch closes, it must not (never, ever) directly switch the drain current ! (To do that, one would need an "opener" which are quite exotic devices for reed switches,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00186.html (22,700 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Re: Hall Effect for Over-current shutdown? (score: 1)
Author: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 11:02:18 -0400
Wolf, interesting idea, but doesn't contact closure take about 10ms? 73 Warren On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:18 PM, wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]> wrote: .. or wind a few turns of fat copper wire around
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00194.html (20,293 bytes)

13. Re: LF: Re: Hall Effect for Over-current shutdown? (score: 1)
Author: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 11:00:57 -0400
Hi Warren, Instead of spending to much effort to the current sensing my advice is to use other FETs. A 500 V FET at 30 V supply voltage is a heavy waste of power in the on resistance. For 30 V and a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00254.html (18,431 bytes)

14. Re: LF: Re: Hall Effect for Over-current shutdown? (score: 1)
Author: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 13:35:25 -0400
Hi Warren, What is the value of the shunt resistor? 73, Stefan Am 09.04.2013 17:00, schrieb Warren Ziegler: Hi Stefan,      I think you are advocating higher voltage and lower current to decrease lo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00280.html (14,381 bytes)

15. LF: Re: Hall Effect for Over-current shutdown? (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 19:52:47 +0100
Ah interesting problem Warren.... why is it over-current?? if it is over-current because a high voltage has welded/melted a short between drain and source, then the protection wont help ....high curr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00281.html (12,350 bytes)

16. RE: LF: Re: Hall Effect for Over-current shutdown? (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 20:12:54 +0000
Hello Warren, that should be possible, I have used a A1302 Hall sensor as a "no contact" >100A current monitor. The sensor was just some mm away from the wire and was calibrated once using a (expensi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00311.html (18,473 bytes)

17. Re: LF: Re: Hall Effect for Over-current shutdown? (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 15:47:58 +0100
Hi Stefan that might be taking a bit of a risk! A 100v working FET might be ok at 24 V but the recommended minimum rating is 4 times the DC supply for Class D and E. It does mean you have to put up w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-04/msg00333.html (18,209 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu