Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+HF_MF2LF\s+\#1\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: HF_MF2LF #1 (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 14:45:01 +0100
Dear Ed, LF Group, Just quickly checked your HF frequencies, which are 14213.650kHz and 14349.972kHz to the nearest Hz - this will make the difference frequency 136.322kHz, +/- 2Hz. Will be monitorin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00366.html (12,396 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: HF_MF2LF #1 (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 15:19:52 +0100
Dear Ed, LF Group, Just quickly checked your HF frequencies, which are 14213.650kHz and 14349.972kHz to the nearest Hz - this will make the difference frequency 136.322kHz, +/- 2Hz. Will be monitori
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00367.html (11,690 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: HF_MF2LF #1 (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:24:20 EST
Dear Ed and LF Group, a frequency measurement at 16:00 gave a slightly different result. The figures are for the beginning and end of a long dash respectively. f1: 14 213 650.0 to 14 213 650.1 Hz f2:
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00370.html (10,730 bytes)

4. LF: Re: HF_MF2LF #1 (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:47:09 +0100
Dear Ed, LF Group, Now seeing your signal on 1882.318kHz. On 873kHz, I see basically 3 carriers, of similar strength, on 873.000kHz, 873.001 and 873.008kHz. This would put the 3rd order product on 13
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00376.html (11,114 bytes)

5. LF: Re: HF_MF2LF #1 (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 23:49:21 +0100
Dear Ed, LF Group, I checked all the screen shots taken from 1400 - 2200utc, but unfortunately no recognisable signals from RU6LA in the 136kHz band were detectable. CT1DRP was visible at the beginni
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00377.html (11,665 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu