Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Ferrite\s+wideband\s+antennas\?\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? (score: 1)
Author: pws <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:20:02 +0200
Hi Daniele, You wrote: ... Yesterday evening a purchased a bunch of 7 x MU400HH ferrites (10mm x 200mm each) on eBay, planning to join them together "in parallel" to form a fatter rod, no idea if it
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-08/msg00152.html (14,241 bytes)

2. LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:07:52 +0100
Dear Daniele, LF Group, Regarding bandwidth, the first thing to note is that the same principles essentially apply to both air-cored loop and ferrite rod cored loop antennas - the main difference is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-08/msg00289.html (15,567 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? (score: 1)
Author: Daniele Tincani <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
Hello Jim, LF, thanks to all of view for feedbacks to my inquiry. So my rough summary is: - small-size (e.g. ferrite cored) loops need tuning = high Q to provide a reasonable signal level. - interme
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-08/msg00293.html (21,431 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? (score: 1)
Author: Daniele Tincani <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 05:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Hi Peter, LF, is a specific type of wire recommended (or not recommended) for the coil? Best regards Daniele From: pws <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, August 3
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-08/msg00314.html (15,389 bytes)

5. LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? (score: 1)
Author: pws <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:17:03 +0200
Hi again Daniele, I forgot some words about shielding. Do not use solid sheet. I just built a small receiver for rtty at 147 kHz for weather report reception when sailing. Using a fine looking u-shap
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-08/msg00318.html (12,695 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:06:09 +0200
Hi Daniele, Fine! Yes, a nice field to play on. And if a sensitive /p antenna comes out, this is ideal to coming LF with a nature trip ;-) 73, Stefan Am 30.08.2011 13:53, schrieb Daniele Tincani: Hel
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-08/msg00336.html (16,113 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? (score: 1)
Author: Daniele Tincani <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 04:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
Hello Stefan, Thanks a lot for your feedback. Yesterday evening a purchased a bunch of 7 x MU400HH ferrites (10mm x 200mm each) on eBay, planning to join them together "in parallel" to form a fatter
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-08/msg00366.html (16,365 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? (score: 1)
Author: Daniele Tincani <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 07:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
Hello Peter, very helpful information! Thanks a lot. BTW, I downloaded the Pelgrum's work days ago. I will read it carefully before starting my loop construction. Best regards Daniele From: pws <pws@
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-08/msg00373.html (16,802 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:34:02 +0200
Hi Daniele, Could it be possible to tune a ferrite loop over a frequency range as wide as 100-500KHz? Or at least over the EU NDB band (say 300-500KHz)? Any practical suggestion (and/or references on
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-08/msg00406.html (13,386 bytes)

10. LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 23:57:30 +0100
Dear Peter, LF Group, I would be interested to know what method you used to determine SNR for the different rod configurations. In my experiments, the difficult thing is to measure the noise level of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-08/msg00468.html (13,842 bytes)

11. Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? (score: 1)
Author: Daniele Tincani <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
Hello Jim, LF, thanks to all of view for feedbacks to my inquiry. So my rough summary is: - small-size (e.g. ferrite cored) loops need tuning = high Q to provide a reasonable signal level. - intermed
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-08/msg00534.html (20,714 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? (score: 1)
Author: Daniele Tincani <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 04:54:51 -0700 (PDT)
Hello Stefan, Thanks a lot for your feedback. Yesterday evening a purchased a bunch of 7 x MU400HH ferrites (10mm x 200mm each) on eBay, planning to join them together "in parallel" to form a fatter
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-08/msg00702.html (15,789 bytes)

13. Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 21:53:03 +0100
Dear Daniele, LF Group, You wrote: So my rough summary is: - small-size (e.g. ferrite cored) loops need tuning = high Q to provide a reasonable signal level. ...Or a more sophisticated preamplifier d
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-08/msg00709.html (17,780 bytes)

14. Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? (score: 1)
Author: pws <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:58:27 +0200
Hi Jim, You wrote: ... I would be interested to know what method you used to determine SNR for the different rod configurations. ... Simply by going the broadband way and using a very low noise, very
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-09/msg00210.html (11,405 bytes)

15. RE: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 18:21:42 +0200
Hi Peter, try a BFP640,rBB 1ohm.Noise as low as 300pV/sqrt(Hz) is possible.Very cheap,but one drawback,Ft is about 40GHz,not easy to get stable.For topband I use BD139 (yes a lf driver),rbb 1,2 Ohm,v
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-09/msg00425.html (10,323 bytes)

16. Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 18:06:04 +0100
Victor I am having the opposite experience with my antennas. I have to insert Attenuation to avoid overload to my Receivers. Now QRV tonite on 136.5 cw es 137.7 qrs3 de mal/g3kev topband 1nV/sqrt(Hz)
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-09/msg00516.html (11,183 bytes)

17. Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? (score: 1)
Author: pws <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:17:14 +0200
Hi Daniele, Very accurate measurements had shown that Litz-Wire is better especially down at low frequencies <1 MHz. Especially MRI-builders reported positive effects. Myself I never could find a con
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-09/msg00525.html (11,145 bytes)

18. Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 23:08:35 +0100
Dear Peter, Victor, LF Group, Thanks for the info... unfortunately the wide-band type of loop is not really viable at my QTH due to the 10s of volts/metre from the nearby broadcast stations. try a BF
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-09/msg00652.html (11,649 bytes)

19. Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? (score: 1)
Author: pws <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 19:10:17 +0200
Hi Victor, You wrote: try a BFP640,rBB 1ohm.Noise as low as 300pV/sqrt(Hz) is possible.Very cheap,but one drawback,Ft is about 40GHz,not easy to get stable.For topband I use BD139 (yes a lf driver),r
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-09/msg00716.html (9,385 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu