Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Delays\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: Delays (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 18:45:29 +0100
Hi LF, Thanks to those who have commented on delays. The message saying Stefan was going to send 2min dashes on 137.777, when I looked at the message properties, was sent at 1534 and arrived here at
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00028.html (14,668 bytes)

2. RE: LF: Re: Delays (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 19:52:44 +0100
Chris, I guess you referred to this message (see below). I got it at 15:44 UTC, so it's certainly not the "uplink" of the reflector. 73, Rik ON7YD Hi all, Stefan intends to come on for a test near 13
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00104.html (15,521 bytes)

3. LF: Re: Delays (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:29:36 +0100
Hi Chris, I am on BT Internet as well and I am getting messages within 4 mins when posted by UK stations. Certainly one of the mesages from Germany took nearly half an hour to come through, so it may
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00224.html (10,826 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: Delays (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 22:10:38 +0100
On 12/4/2010 9:36 PM, Alan Melia wrote: BTW it is not unusual for Yahoo posting to be delayed a couple of days !! Well, I moderate three Yahoo groups, and this never happened to me.... it may have ha
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00226.html (10,521 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: Delays (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:15:51 +0000
And you can choose how to have messages delivered.   A daily digest would be a good option for those not actually operating on L/MF at the moment who currently get deluged, particularly at weekends.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00234.html (13,966 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: Delays (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:33:21 +0100
Chris This seems to be your problem and not universal. No problem this end. All msgs are almost immediate here. de G3KEV -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Chris To: rsgb_lf_group
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00235.html (14,670 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: Delays (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:51:10 +0100
OM I am still awaiting a reply to my message about your activities on 9 Kcs. When do you expect to transmit. From previous postings I understood you were ready to go and awaiting a NOV. Has the snow
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00377.html (13,009 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: Delays (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:40:25 +0100
Gerhard No problem this end all msgs are almost immediate. This reflector works perfectly well. If some think YAHOO is the answer let them GO. When this was mentioned before noone seemed interested i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00383.html (15,032 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: Delays (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 19:38:40 +0000
OM I am still awaiting a reply to my message about your activities on 9 Kcs. When do you expect to transmit. From previous postings I understood you were ready to go and awaiting a NOV. Has the snow
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00564.html (17,282 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Re: Delays (score: 1)
Author: Gerhard Hickl <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 18:41:25 +0100
Gentlemen! We are used to receive signals as slow as QRSS60 and slower.....compared to that, what are some few minutes of delay on the reflector? Right, nothing! So from my point of view, I'm complet
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00642.html (13,966 bytes)

11. LF: Re: Delays (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:29:35 +0100
LF, Is anyone else experiencing long delays with messages being relayed by this site? It's rather screwing up keeping track of what Stefans up to here. Chris, G4AYT.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00694.html (10,403 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Re: Delays (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 18:14:14 +0100
So the advantage is CENSORSHIP if someone disagrees with your point of view. Go ahead and set it up. You tried this before and failed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! G3KEV -- Original Message -- From: rogerla
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00706.html (13,207 bytes)

13. Re: LF: Re: Delays (score: 1)
Author: John GM4SLV <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 21:37:52 +0000
Alan, LF, This isn't a "problem" it's an "advantage"..... There's no need for the facilities of a Yahoo group when all we need to do is pass textual messages. The recent increase in allowed attachmen
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00796.html (10,278 bytes)

14. Re: LF: Re: Delays (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 21:37:14 +0100
Hi Chris that would seem about what I was seeing BUT I dont know what time zone time they are using.....you have to be careful about this, because some UK posting are timed in Eastern Standard Time (
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00801.html (13,926 bytes)

15. Re: LF: Re: Delays (score: 1)
Author: John GM4SLV <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 21:23:40 +0000
I have to agree with Mal on this one. A pure, old fashoined, majordomo driven email reflector is perfectly adequate for the majority of traffic on this list. There is no guarantee that Yahoo group me
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00989.html (11,670 bytes)

16. Re: LF: Re: Delays (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 22:39:46 +0100
Hi John and others, Confirmed... being member of various groups there: The delay is often much worse than here on the trusty old majordomo server. Sometimes the delay (at yahoo) can be in the range o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg01085.html (11,189 bytes)

17. Re: LF: Re: Delays (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 16:48:37 +0000
Sorry to go on about this, but a Yahoo Groups version of the LF-reflector would serve our needs better IMHO. A group for sub-9kHz has already been set up. See http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sub9k
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg01128.html (12,884 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu