Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Wellbrook\s+Loop\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: Wellbrook Loop (score: 1)
Author: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:19:45 +0100
Hi Andy I use Wellbrook loops - 1530 for hf (150 kHz - 30 MHz) and 1010 (10 kHz - 10 MHz) for lf. They work very well with my SDR-14 and SDR-IQ. The loop feed box is filled with a potting compound to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-12/msg00207.html (11,353 bytes)

2. Re: LF: RE: Wellbrook Loop (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:28:47 +0100
It would appear there are a lot of BLOWN loops. I wonder why ? g3kev
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-12/msg00258.html (10,762 bytes)

3. RE: LF: RE: Wellbrook Loop (score: 1)
Author: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:01:04 +0100
Hi Chris I didn't realise you were a member of this group. Thanks for the link - I have been studying your other paper on complementary push-pull amplifiers for active antennas but hadn't seen your l
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-12/msg00416.html (11,085 bytes)

4. LF: Re: Wellbrook Loop (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:28:49 +0100
On 12/16/2011 6:49 PM, DENNIS EASTERLING wrote: I read with interest the comments about the Welbrook Loop, raised by the review by Steve G0KYA in this month's Radcom Any chance to have a PDF copy of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-12/msg00439.html (11,436 bytes)

5. Re: LF: RE: Wellbrook Loop (score: 1)
Author: Chris Trask <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 07:35:21 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
Using the augmentation gives you a similar input impedance at far less current. It gives you the opportunity to operate the transistor at it's best NF. Chris
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-12/msg00468.html (9,671 bytes)

6. Re: LF: RE: Wellbrook Loop (score: 1)
Author: Chris Trask <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 06:14:36 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
You might want to add this to your list of suitable alternatives: http://www.home.earthlink.net/~christrask/Paper009.html Chris Trask N7ZWY / WDX3HLB Senior Member IEEE http://www.home.earthlink.net
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-12/msg00527.html (10,576 bytes)

7. LF: Re: Wellbrook Loop (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:52:16 +0100
Andy es Co A friend lent me one of these loops and I was not impressed with its performance compared to my resonant inv L system for 137. Likwise on 500 Khz compared to my 1/4 wave inv L is was well
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-12/msg00612.html (10,398 bytes)

8. Re: LF: RE: Wellbrook Loop (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:20:29 +0000
This sort of outline concept for a balanced augmented configuration... http://www.g4jnt.com/LFLoopAnt.gif Not sure if the emitter centre tap needs to be decoupled to actual ground. If not, the whole
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-12/msg00632.html (11,079 bytes)

9. Re: LF: RE: Wellbrook Loop (score: 1)
Author: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:40:13 -0500
Mal, They are mostly marketed to swls and thus are not protected against large signals coming from a nearby transmitter! -- 73 Warren K2ORS                 WD2XGJ                 WD2XSH/23          
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-12/msg00706.html (12,672 bytes)

10. Re: LF: RE: Wellbrook Loop (score: 1)
Author: "Chris Trask" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:22:47 -0700
That results in far higher distortion as the emitter signal voltages are not symmetrical, and you cannot force them to be. Chris Trask N7ZWY / WDX3HLB Senior Member IEEE http://www.home.earthlink.ne
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-12/msg00725.html (10,931 bytes)

11. Re: LF: RE: Wellbrook Loop (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 18:54:38 +0000
A very interesting circuit concept - I hadn't heard the term "augmentation" before. (It looks to have something in common - and completely turned upside down - with the bootstrapping technique used t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-12/msg00737.html (11,314 bytes)

12. RE: LF: RE: Wellbrook Loop (score: 1)
Author: Chris Trask <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:31:48 -0500 (EST)
Clifton Labs used a portion of that paper in their latest active monopole amplifier offering. They added a bipolar emitter follower stage between the JFET input and complementary output to further u
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-12/msg00801.html (10,325 bytes)

13. Re: LF: RE: Wellbrook Loop (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:24:38 +0000
This one from Chris has an input stage similar to the design I did those years ago, but with added feedback and more. The common base push-pull running open-loop, if memory serves, gave about 0.5 ohm
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-12/msg00852.html (10,262 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu