Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Olivia\s+8\s+x\s+250\s+\/\s+psk31\s+\/\s+MFSK\s+8\s+503\s+CENTER\s+BEACON\s+\-\s+RUNNING\s+NOW\s+\-\s+1615\s+HRS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Olivia\s+8\s+x\s+250\s+\/\s+psk31\s+\/\s+MFSK\s+8\s+503\s+CENTER\s+BEACON\s+\-\s+RUNNING\s+NOW\s+\-\s+1615\s+HRS\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. RE: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON - RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS (score: 1): Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:04:29 +0100; LF, Well almost !!!! Gary - G4WGT. --Original Message-- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gary - G4WGT Sent: 03 January 2009 19:46 To:; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00014.html (19,543 bytes)
2. Re: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON - RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS (score: 1): Author: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 19:24:38 +0000; Simultaneous MULTIPSK, identical reception durations. -- OLIVIA : q3zR(tR,4Lv;#yN CQ CQ CQ DE...g0nbd g0nbd g0nbd CQ CQ CQ DE...g0nbd g0nbd g0nbd CQ CQ CQ DE...g0nbd g0nbd g0nbd kkk =10XWLtf%uaAQ$G(I; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00056.html (17,296 bytes)
3. RE: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON - RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS (score: 1): Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:06:49 +0100; Hi Graham, LF, I am using 2 - Fldigi for Olivia & MFSK, TrueTTY for PSK. I note that the MFSK decodes poorly whilst the Olivia is Txing. I will try using 3 - Multipsk later if you are still running t; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00158.html (18,750 bytes)
4. Re: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON - RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 20:09:58 +0100; You were telling us not so long ago that narrow band signals were preferable because of S/N, ie QRS 240 etc Frequency hopping is not wide band signals but narrow signals hopping around the band. Spre; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00270.html (19,558 bytes)
5. RE: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON - RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS (score: 1): Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 20:15:40 +0100; Graham, LF, I set up 3 x Multipsk to decode the signals & went for meal. I have returned to review the situation & it seems that each mode has decoded similarly. Of course due to the distance between; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00362.html (18,464 bytes)
6. Re: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON - RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS (score: 1): Author: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 19:02:07 +0000; A sudden enhancement and just got some simultaneous copy : OLIVIA : KAXNnjr4r1i`qaXsaN"@Jtzr- CQ CQ CQ DE.b$0nb>mMbD g0nbd CQ CQ CQ DE..g0nbd g0nbd g0nbd CQ CQ CQ DE...g0nbd g0nbd g0nbd kkk )u~DEc$B5; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00407.html (16,823 bytes)
7. Re: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON - RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS (score: 1): Author: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 19:21:52 +0000; I didn't say that. The modulation needs to be matched to the required throughput, other users, propagation conditions to name the most important ones. At the moment, both those modes appear to be par; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00522.html (19,604 bytes)
8. Re: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON - RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:12:54 +0100; Thanks Andy, Well the drive level is direct from multipsk , but with 2 applications running thats +6db up 3 .. may be +12 db over the norm .. might of been a bit much for the soundblaster awe64 (ISA; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00534.html (21,106 bytes)
9. Fw: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON - RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS (score: 1): Author: "dave.riley3" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 12:10:35 -0500; -- Original Message -- From: "Graham" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 11:49 AM Subject: Re: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 C; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00615.html (12,321 bytes)
10. Re: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON - RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS (score: 1): Author: John P-G <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 22:28:35 +0000; Mal, Of course, as usual, you are wrong. These OLIVIA/MFSK experiments are trying to establish the relative performance of various coding and modulation schemes on a band that hitherto has been domin; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00620.html (15,257 bytes)
11. Re: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON - RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:04:08 +0100; Andy, Just checked, each system is round 45 watts peak , showing 90 to 100 watts peak o/p when olivia and mfsk running , peak hight not changed .. just under the exciter alc limit ... amazing just ho; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00634.html (20,738 bytes)
12. Re: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON - RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 20:28:56 +0100; Its not a few hundred hertz it is SEVERAL hundred hertz. -- Original Message -- From: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 7:2; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00645.html (18,300 bytes)
13. RE: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON - RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS (score: 1): Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 20:30:38 +0100; Mal, LF, I calculate that at this moment only 400Hz is in use with Graham's transmission, surely you can find somewhere to operate without QRM. I think that leaves 2.6KHz of the band left. In fact I; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00662.html (17,741 bytes)
14. Re: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON - RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS (score: 1): Author: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:38:05 +0000; But have you thought about the power DENSITY. Its a well known fact that spreading a signal in frequency improves channel usage and assists weak signalling - go back to Shannon's eqn. Look at first G; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00705.html (21,176 bytes)
15. Re: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON - RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS (score: 1): Author: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 19:27:09 +0000; Are you still running identical ERP ? The Olivia trace looks a lot stronger on the waterfall and I can't see the MFSK signal at all, even when it is decoding well. Same MultiPSK display on both. Andy; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00918.html (14,368 bytes)
16. Re: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON - RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 17:49:35 +0100; Ok Gary, Thats the first odd report hihi ...psk was not supposed to be better ....... ! doesn't look well for decodes at range .. i will try and add a few more watts .. are you running x 3 multipsk a; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00956.html (17,340 bytes)
17. Re: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON - RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 20:37:09 +0100; Andy, Are you looking at the same level of demodulation for olivia and mfsk ? If so that's a useful outcome as I know some stations are in the process of making tx transverters, but don't have linear; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00996.html (19,147 bytes)
18. RE: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON - RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS (score: 1): Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:06:27 +0100; Andy, I would be good to have you aboard ! Gary - G4WGT. --Original Message-- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andy Talbot Sent: 03 Ja; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg01027.html (21,623 bytes)
19. Re: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON - RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 20:13:27 +0100; Most of it is GIBBIRISH and not suited to 500 khz. Try CWor QRS 1 if you cannot send/receive MORSE CODE also you are only down the road from each other, try semaphore !!!! -- Original Message -- From; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg01054.html (17,122 bytes)
20. Re: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON - RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS (score: 1): Author: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 19:59:33 +0000; Yes, just about the same level of decoding, but MFSK certainly looks weaker on teh spectrogrram. Need to stop Rx and tunr off now, but will monitor this reflector Interesting stuff - half-tempted to; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg01130.html (22,217 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]