Jim, thanks for clarifying - I thought that you were opting more for the existing ERP approach. I feel that we are more likely to get a better response asking for an increase in ERP as this is easier
Dear John, LF Group, As a simple answer, I would favour sticking with an ERP limit - based on the present experience the existing 0.1W ERP limit is adequate for a UK-only band, but if we are looking
Thanks Jim, I tend to agree with you, but I'm not quite sure whether you are supporting the 20W power to the aerial limit, with the additional ERP ceiling that Rik was proposing. Apologies for not un
Dear John, Rik, LF Group, I would agree with Rik's comments. Experimentation on 136k (and 73k) over the last several years has given us a pretty good idea of how to optimise the efficiency of small L
Alan, thanks for your comments appreciating the work that has gone on these past years to get to this position. As I said in my reply to Laurence it's very much a team effort as you appreciate, with
Thanks Rik, that's an interesting thought to have a max ERP stipulated. It might make matters easier with Ofcom as they would be able to consider the worst case. 73 John, G3WKL
I'd be interested in any further views to Laurie's proposal; I'am open to suggestions as to the power level, but it will be important to hit a target that is both challenging to the experimenter, hel
John, I think your group has done a fantastic job getting UK amateurs the first general operating permits for 500K in Europe. I'm interested in aerial experiments but, to make this offer some returns
Thought that I had better respond to Laurie's e-mail, now a few days ago. This is because the matter of the power level is to an extent under review by Ofcom. If you recall we, RSGB, asked back in 20
This is correct Laurie and if you cannot get it into the air as high as possible, put the radials (insulated) on top of the ground. I use only 2 radials on 500 elevated 7 feet above ground, ie GP The
