Hello Ray & All! Rcc> and above. As an alternative, 144 MHz EME has dropped the use of T and M The ending "K" to necessary... as against EME Rcc> When both stations have exchanged callsigns, O and R
In a message dated 12/17/02 4:58:50 PM Greenwich Standard Time, [email protected] writes: Hello LF-fans! I like the following algorithm more: QRSS - QRSS -- 1) CQ G3AQC K 2) G3AQC RU6LA K 3) RU6LA O AQC K (or
Hello LF-fans! I like the following algorithm more: QRSS - QRSS -- 1) CQ G3AQC K 2) G3AQC RU6LA K 3) RU6LA O AQC K (or RU6LA O G3AQC K if no correct G3AQC call) 4) AQC O RO ("Roger O") LA K (or AQC O
? sounds a bit long, all that you need is an otherwise unused letter with suitable hamming distance. How about 'U' Stewart G3YSX Andy G4JNT Laurie, John et al, Since I'm not directly involved, I shou
I was going to say something similar. Both EME and Meteor Scatter make use of rigidly defined QSO formats and R definitely means Roger/Received OK so you need another symbol to request a repeat. How
Laurie, John et al, Since I'm not directly involved, I should probably keep my mouth shut, but from experience in other forms of weak-signal work I might suggest reserving "R" for "Roger" and just se
I am attempting a X band contact on 73kHz, and would like to discuss a minimal X band QSO format,remembering that openings are short. As I understand it the requirments are for an exchange of full ca
