Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+QSO\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. LF: QSO (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 20:09:08 +0100
Paul Can we have a qso xband u on 136.8 and I will tx on 502.57 khz or 1833 khz MF CW 73 mal/g3kev
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00025.html (7,845 bytes)

2. Re: LF: QSO (score: 1)
Author: Paul-Henrik <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 22:23:32 +0200
Mal, LF Just checking what I can hear right now on 500 with the 136kHz TX antenna: SK6RUD, DI2AM, GW4HXO So RX on 500 should not be a problem for X-band. I have to change positions and swap some BNC
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00451.html (8,441 bytes)

3. Re: LF: QSO (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:22:18 +0100
There is no need for QRS around EU. In the past all EU was worked on CW and daytime over 1000 miles plus on 137 kcs Maybe QRS for N America/China and further afield. QRS around EU is a backward step
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-07/msg00089.html (10,854 bytes)

4. Re: LF: QSO (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:18:26 +0100
How could going backwards be Positive !!!! Check the records for years gone by on 137 and look at what is happening today. I am but pointing out the facts, has noone learnt anything from information
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-07/msg00242.html (11,240 bytes)

5. LF: QSO (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:13:22 +0100
There is no need for QRS around EU. In the past all EU was worked on CW and daytime over 1000 miles plus on 137 kcs Maybe QRS for N America/China and further afield. QRS around EU is a backward step
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-07/msg00418.html (8,479 bytes)

6. LF: qso (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:54:36 +0100
LF Someone called me at 1930 utc on 137.8 then stopped mal/g3kev
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-11/msg00485.html (7,551 bytes)

7. LF: QSO (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2012 01:11:05 +0100
Tnx Stefan es Wolf for the 502/472.5 CW QSO this evening. Nice signal from you both but vy hvy QRN this end to nite. I worked IQ2MI/Jul on CW on 14/4/2012 at 2103 utc. he was 569 with me and gave me
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-08/msg00087.html (8,103 bytes)

8. Re: LF: QSO (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2012 11:03:52 +0200
Thanks Mal - as usual 'armchair copy' from your side. The QSO was remarkable since I heard the thunder around the shack while still transmitting. Also thanks for info abt Jul - I only caught him one
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-08/msg00245.html (9,346 bytes)

9. Re: LF: qso (score: 1)
Author: "John Currie" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 22:20:34 -0400
Hi Mal Yes was surprised to hear you. Normally run KW but just woke up and linear was off . Will look for you agn on 40. Hope to get tx on 136 this summer 73 de John VE1ZJ Hi John Thanks for the nice
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-04/msg00012.html (8,696 bytes)

10. LF: qso (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 18:09:53 +0100
Hi John Thanks for the nice cw qso this morning on 7 mhz. Your 50 watt tx was doing well at this late hour this morning 0930 local time. I worked a few JA stns last evening and seemed to be the only
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-04/msg00016.html (8,257 bytes)

11. Re: LF: QSO (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 18:28:00 +0000
Dear LF Group, is G3LDO and OH1TN's 73/136k QSO, which is cross band QSO. Hi Jim Surely a xband Transatlantic QSO between Canada/USA to the UK is more of an achievement and especially those of us tha
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00385.html (11,546 bytes)

12. Re: LF: QSO (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 19:37:04 EST
In a message dated 1/8/02 8:47:15 PM GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: I would say a 2 sec dot solid xband qso to Canada 136/7025 khz is a RECORD plus a 60 sec dot qso that took
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00393.html (9,148 bytes)

13. Re: LF: QSO (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 19:27:24 EST
Hi Jim Surely a xband Transatlantic QSO between Canada/USA to the UK is more of an achievement and especially those of us that have made several and not just a ONE OFF, than one just up the road. I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00394.html (9,747 bytes)

14. Re: LF: QSO (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 18:57:32 +0000
[email protected] wrote: In a message dated 1/7/02 6:24:34 PM GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: 1. Is there a record of any two way qso's on 136 or 73 khz. 2. Xband qso's 136/HF rea
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00403.html (15,190 bytes)

15. Re: LF: QSO (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 18:39:57 +0000
Dear LF Group, Another one worth mentioning is G3LDO and OH1TN's 73/136k QSO, which is probably the record LF/LF cross band QSO. Hi Jim Surely a xband Transatlantic QSO between Canada/USA to the UK
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00404.html (10,228 bytes)

16. Re: LF: QSO (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 14:42:06 +0000
Dear LF Group, Another one worth mentioning is G3LDO and OH1TN's 73/136k QSO, which is probably the record LF/LF cross band QSO. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00411.html (9,417 bytes)

17. Re: LF: QSO (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 07:59:38 EST
In a message dated 1/7/02 6:24:34 PM GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: 1. Is there a record of any two way qso's on 136 or 73 khz. 2. Xband qso's 136/HF real time. 3. Those usin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00415.html (11,551 bytes)

18. LF: QSO (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 18:20:35 +0000
Hi All Is there anyone out there keeping any records about TA activity and countries worked by LF operators. For instance: 1. Is there a record of any two way qso's on 136 or 73 khz. 2. Xband qso's 1
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00439.html (9,468 bytes)

19. LF: QSO (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 18:12:12 +0100
Hi all in the USA and beyond. Is there anyone suitably equipped over there to try for a CW two way on 137 khz. If anyone is ready I will rig the LF antenna system and have a go. I will arrange a fiel
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-03/msg00022.html (8,581 bytes)

20. Re: LF: QSO (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 00:23:31 -0600
Warren??? Got that big amp done yet? You or John with a kilowatt should be up to the task I would guess. -- Mike WE0H WD2XGI hamilton mal wrote: Hi all in the USA and beyond. Is there anyone suitably
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-03/msg00043.html (9,577 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu