Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+NA\s+VLF\s*$/: 87 ]

Total 87 documents matching your query.

41. Re: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 20:30:18 -0230 (NDT)
Sorry again... another phase glitch to replace a fried coil 2250 utc. Good luck both ways! Joe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00143.html (11,616 bytes)

42. Re: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 19:31:35 +0000
Looks good but I didn't get a decode, just 'NK!' at Eb/N0 = -0.2 dB. I swept a range of frequencies either side of +93 uHz in 5 uHz steps but nothing better came out. It was a noisy night again! Goo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00144.html (13,269 bytes)

43. Re: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 19:15:15 -0230 (NDT)
There was icing overnight and the current was very low this morning. The ice has melted, the current is back to nearly 0.3A and EbNaut transmission will be repeated tonight 2300 ut. NTP is running. T
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00145.html (12,036 bytes)

44. Re: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 18:40:50 +0000
Once again, no decode overnight 14th/15th. The noise was a bit lower, was the transmission ok? -- Paul Nicholson --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00148.html (12,995 bytes)

45. Re: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 17:47:11 -0230 (NDT)
TX completed and the current is normal. I am happy to try again tonight, same settings, 2300ut. 73 & TNX Joe Once again, no decode overnight 14th/15th. The noise was a bit lower, was the transmission
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00149.html (12,516 bytes)

46. Re: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: James Plesa <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 16:42:31 -0400 (EDT)
Joe and Paul, I can collect data on Joe's signal from some other receivers this week. Nominal operating sensitivity is 10 fT/rt-Hz or better; generally southwest (SSW, SW, WSW) at 2000 -3000 km Would
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00150.html (14,057 bytes)

47. Re: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 17:32:15 +0000
The noise was low last night, almost as quiet as 7th/8th but still the message doesn't decode. It should be an easy decode at +1dB or so, especially with the improvements you've made. The strongest '
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00154.html (14,110 bytes)

48. Re: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 17:00:53 -0230 (NDT)
Hello Jim, I will keep the TX on until further notice. Good luck with reception. 73 Joe Joe and Paul, I can collect data on Joe's signal from some other receivers this week. Nominal operating sensiti
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00156.html (12,801 bytes)

49. Re: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 17:11:46 -0230 (NDT)
I hope the improvements were not to reduce the erp... OK let's try a carrier tonight. NTP and the raspi clock are working well. A new helix will be wound when the wire arrives and I'm building up the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00157.html (12,664 bytes)

50. Re: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 10:19:39 +0000
A poor signal overnight 16th/17th. For a while it came up to 0.05 fT but the average was about 0.035 fT, poor S/N. Daytime 17th was weak too, only averaging 0.025 fT but S/N was fairly good. Last nig
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00161.html (14,306 bytes)

51. Re: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 20:17:02 -0230 (NDT)
Thank-you Paul. Will try EbNaut 2300 tonight, same settings. Hoping for good conditions! Jor I think we should switch back to carrier so that I can take some more measurements. I will keep the TX on
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00164.html (13,744 bytes)

52. Re: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 22:35:51 -0230 (NDT)
Correction, starting 0100 this morning. Operator error. Thank-you Paul. Will try EbNaut 2300 tonight, same settings. Hoping for good conditions! Jor I think we should switch back to carrier so that I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00165.html (13,994 bytes)

53. Re: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 15:12:46 +0000
And another noisy night too. No surprise no decode. Let's try again. 3 chars will certainly get through given a quiet night like 17th/18th. We just have to be patient and keep trying until the condi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00166.html (13,816 bytes)

54. Re: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 18:55:40 -0230 (NDT)
Yes, let's keep trying. All set for tonight Paul. Correction, starting 0100 this morning. Operator error. And another noisy night too. No surprise no decode. Let's try again. 3 chars will certainly g
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00167.html (13,173 bytes)

55. Re: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 19:10:32 -0230 (NDT)
After much wire and effort, the erp is up by 2.5 dB. EbNaut again tonight starting 2300 utc. 73 Joe VO1NA Yes, let's keep trying. All set for tonight Paul. Correction, starting 0100 this morning. Ope
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00168.html (13,501 bytes)

56. Re: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 16:56:41 -0230 (NDT)
Last night we had snow and the antenna became detuned with a large drop in the erp. This likely affected last night's EbNaut transmission. The snow has melted, the erp has rebounded. The carrier will
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00170.html (12,750 bytes)

57. Re: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 18:43:33 +0000
The last few nights have been noisy, no real chance of decoding a message but it should decode with a quiet night, even if we lose the last hour because of the terminator. Today your signal was clea
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00176.html (14,165 bytes)

58. Re: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 21:23:45 +0200
...maybe it is worth to try the daytime period, because it is much longer these days. Also the QRN may be much lower too... 73, Stefan Am 22.05.2017 20:43, schrieb Paul Nicholson: The last few nights
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00178.html (13,676 bytes)

59. Re: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 10:04:48 +0000
Overnight 22nd/23rd was fairly quiet and the decoder turned up 'VO!' at Eb/N0 = +0.5dB, BER 42.7% with constant reference phase, peaking at frequency of 8270.0070925 Hz + 6 uHz. Rank 7430 in the deco
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00181.html (13,775 bytes)

60. Re: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 06:23:12 -0400
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00184.html (10,722 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu