Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+JT9\-10\s+\@\s+474\s+\+1400\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+JT9\-10\s+\@\s+474\s+\+1400\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. RE: LF: JT9-10 @ 474 +1400 (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:10:36 +0000; Hello Joe, all, if there are some "takers" I could do some JT9-10 transmission tonight on 501.4kHz (500kHz dial) starting 20 UTC. The setup here is a Kenwood TS440 transmitting on 3.5MHz mixed with 3; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00015.html (12,912 bytes)
2. LF: JT9-10 @ 474 +1400 (score: 1): Author: Steinar Aanesland <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:34:46 +0100; Laurence and the rest I will beaconing in Jt9-10 from about 23:30UTC (midnight in Norway) and until 07:00UTC . I hope my IC-756II and the transverter is stable enough. Try to copy me :) LA5VNA Steina; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00017.html (10,352 bytes)
3. Re: LF: JT9-10 @ 474 +1400 (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:58:33 +0100; Hi Joe, That sounds interesting. I'm looking forward to your new WSPR features. Your work for the (real) low bands is apprechiated. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 17.12.2012 23:47, schrieb Joe Taylor: Hi Lauren; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00054.html (12,646 bytes)
4. Re: LF: JT9-10 @ 474 +1400 (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 01:02:07 +0100; Laurence, There was some solar activity again, since a long time. K=4, DST~ -35 nT. I guess the polar path is closed for the next few days due to that event? Pse cfm. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 17.12.2012 2; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00377.html (11,255 bytes)
5. RE: LF: JT9-10 @ 474 +1400 (score: 1): Author: Laurence KL1 X <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 14:41:17 -0900; Looking over the Pole JT9-10 474 +1400 Laurence KL 1 X > Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:34:46 +0100 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected]; [email protected]; rsgb_lf_; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00456.html (10,814 bytes)
6. Re: LF: JT9-10 @ 474 +1400 (score: 1): Author: Joe Taylor <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:47:17 -0500; Hi Laurence, Steinar, and all, Please send me an example of a JT9-10 file that seems like it should have decoded, but did not. NOBODY has yet done so. I am reasonably sure that small amounts of frequ; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00487.html (11,824 bytes)
7. Re: LF: JT9-10 @ 474 +1400 (score: 1): Author: Steinar Aanesland <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 20:26:06 +0100; Thanks Tobias. The conclusion is clear , my system in NOT stable enough when using JT9-10. Pity , but that's life ;( LA5VNA Steinar loc:JO59jq Mal and spam filtering: STRONG José Ros software not sup; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00499.html (11,844 bytes)
8. Re: LF: JT9-10 @ 474 +1400 (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 02:20:01 +0100; Ooh, i would like to join in in JT9-10 but there are still some unknown problems with the MF TX converter. At least i know that it's this converter. I'v ealready shot a power supply and a soundcard,; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00507.html (12,282 bytes)
9. Re: LF: JT9-10 @ 474 +1400 (score: 1): Author: Tobias DG3LV <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 01:36:33 +0100; Hi Steinar ! This is a screenshot of a replay of tonight's receptions of your JT9-10 signals. Besides the drift it would qualify for good SNRs i think. Joe K1JT will get the saved WAVs as he requeste; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00566.html (12,111 bytes)
10. RE: LF: JT9-10 @ 474 +1400 (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 13:57:46 +0000; Hello Tobias, sorry, I didn't think of the lower offset (1000Hz) with JT9-10. But I will stick to 501.4kHz TX frequency = 500.4kHz dial for 1000Hz audio. I will start at 20:00UTC and initially go for; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00636.html (16,274 bytes)
11. Re: LF: JT9-10 @ 474 +1400 (score: 1): Author: Jim and Hannelore Fisher <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:29:44 +0000; happy to test it here Jim VE1JF -- Original Message -- From: "Joe Taylor" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 10:47 PM Subject: Re: LF: JT9-10 @ 474; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00717.html (12,509 bytes)
12. RE: LF: JT9-10 @ 474 +1400 (score: 1): Author: Laurence KL1 X <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:15:23 -0900; Steinar I was getting some reasonable syncs but appeared not stable enough - so that confirms it :-) Laurence KL 1 X > Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 20:26:06 +0100 > From: [email protected] > To: DG3LV@gm; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00794.html (12,483 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]