Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+G7NKS\s+\-\s+Double\s+Side\s+Band\:\s+wspr\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: G7NKS - Double Side Band: wspr? (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:08:19 +0000
I refer the honourable gentleman to the report I made some time ago.... 11/11/09: == Jim. LF It looks like G7NKS has a 50/100Hz problem on the audio - both in TX and RX directions - there are up to 3
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00018.html (11,363 bytes)

2. Re: LF: G7NKS - Double Side Band: wspr? (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 13:58:54 -0800 (PST)
Hi Jim and LF group Please observe the reports I am getting from Jim G7NKS WSPR transmissions :- First a weak one and then a strong one then a weak one (see below) does it mean there's a sprog / modu
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00021.html (37,118 bytes)

3. Re: LF: G7NKS - Double Side Band: wspr? (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:02:42 +0000 (GMT)
Tnx Alberto I think the SR front end is quite wide infact so it would be really good to have so much BW. Anyway its not a problem to broarden the F/E filtering. Currently use same input for Rx on 3.5
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00142.html (13,100 bytes)

4. Re: LF: G7NKS - Double Side Band: wspr? (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 06:04:55 -0800 (PST)
Veeeery interesting Alberto Would that give me 192 Kc/s of tunable band width on my SDR radio given the right software? There has been a lot of debate on the softrock reflector but this one seems to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00364.html (12,290 bytes)

5. RE: LF: G7NKS - Double Side Band: wspr? (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:52:33 -0800 (PST)
Hi Jim OK too bad you can't resolve it with your existing Sound Card. When considering a USB SC think about SDR (the future of Ham Radio). M-Audio is considered a good card but see M0KGK's site for c
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00647.html (29,847 bytes)

6. Re: LF: G7NKS - Double Side Band: wspr? (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:34:08 +0100
OK too bad you can't resolve it with your existing Sound Card. When considering a USB SC think about SDR (the future of Ham Radio). M-Audio is considered a good card but see M0KGK's site for compari
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00739.html (10,947 bytes)

7. RE: LF: G7NKS - Double Side Band: wspr? (score: 1)
Author: "James Cowburn" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:31:39 +0100
Dear LF The double or treble reports on strong signals are due to a main hum problem on my system. It only seems to appear on 500 and only on signals where I am strong e,g, MOBMU and MOFMT. I&#8217;m
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00798.html (29,027 bytes)

8. Re: LF: G7NKS - Double Side Band: wspr? (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:45:15 +0100
M0FMT wrote: Veeeery interesting Alberto Would that give me 192 Kc/s of tunable band width on my SDR radio given the right software? There has been a lot of debate on the softrock reflector but this
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00803.html (11,561 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu