Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Fwd\:\s+Questions\s+about\s+73kHz\s+and\s+sub\s+8\.3kHz\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Fwd: Questions about 73kHz and sub 8.3kHz (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:00:41 +0000
Still awaiting OFCOM responses after about 8 working days since first email sent.  Will post reply here, assuming they ever manage one. I am not hopeful. 73s Roger G3XBM -- Forwarded message -- From:
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-02/msg00095.html (12,944 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Fwd: Questions about 73kHz and sub 8.3kHz (score: 1)
Author: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 08:49:19 -0500
My questions were: Am I correct in assuming that radio amateurs may legally experiment in the old 73kHz band as long as output power is less than 72dBuA/m at 10m? This is the limit for licence-exempt
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-02/msg00444.html (14,255 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Fwd: Questions about 73kHz and sub 8.3kHz (score: 1)
Author: John Rabson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:09:46 +0100
My understanding is that, when dealing with Ofcoms predecessors, the RSGB sometimes found it useful not to ask outright for a specific facility, but rather to say If we were to ask you a question alo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-02/msg00445.html (14,783 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Fwd: Questions about 73kHz and sub 8.3kHz (score: 1)
Author: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:29:25 -0500
This allowed the licensing authority to comment without having to say Yes or No. What they sometimes did was to say &ldquo;We would not be able to give you that, but if you were to ask for this ...&
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-02/msg00446.html (16,281 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Fwd: Questions about 73kHz and sub 8.3kHz (score: 1)
Author: John Rabson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:35:58 +0100
Warren, I think it was Alan Melia who said When dealing with Authority, try to avoid asking a question to which you might not like the answer. 73 John Attachment: signature.asc Description: Message s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-02/msg00447.html (16,897 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Fwd: Questions about 73kHz and sub 8.3kHz (score: 1)
Author: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:08:50 -0500
Good background information. A few years ago someone on the U.S. longwave reflector decided that it was a good idea to pepper the FCC with very pointed and specific questions. Warren, Was that the fe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-02/msg00448.html (12,014 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Fwd: Questions about 73kHz and sub 8.3kHz (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:42:34 +0000
All points noted. WRT below 8.3kHz I'd like a clear unambiguous answer saying, as long as no interference to legitimate services caused, it is OK to use the frequencies freely. At 73kHz, likewise, it
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-02/msg00449.html (13,581 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu