Re: LF: Fwd: Questions about 73kHz and sub 8.3kHz

To:	"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject:	Re: LF: Fwd: Questions about 73kHz and sub 8.3kHz
From:	Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date:	Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:42:34 +0000
Authentication-results:	mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=pass [email protected]; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Delivered-to:	[email protected]
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=0+h/CCUUpw80ufX++EqFp3BZ8IHR7fZbuj6+0LlmumU=; b=c9LmnxTDMEHLfuqDxZ8ALGYaa5hk/io2gSjOyflWgWPo0cMQZeY9/AbZtNrWtQbUMH zsUgi1SpMebRHGdhfxkbXxfhcj4TxBfLByEp1DOk1gAyv3+i6Zm33PxjSTDp/4f5K/nX PsAQS2Az6RudHJp8YZ1PJuKiPIiKPS05UOrMGhvRWa6PB6G6Ar0aU4nmFutdVHlVU4uf +p7DO6n+vjVA8sETA0/D8BlYQUBUQSrYNVN+k9qZn+v0pjNVErscYXcExJG5O6yvFibj NnWRNSfFyLJEe7jMrTjXvrMWFn/0aVfxbrNDe0NXjPtgVkHi+eg3cmmpcRgdOYcQhj0h Cx2A==
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
References:	<CAHAQVWO7FKFFwEzrAh9zK0yG18ZGkywWgAp5QRcfRV4zbSiGng@mail.gmail.com> <CAHAQVWMo2n-T=DJivcy9=h49AkrESjS8r+Op1MoL_sp3dxqX8Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAMFjj72za1HtQPh3L4wXZz=UowR0vipHfxby3SLqGjiJR-hSHw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAMFjj71oBZhcJzkBv4JMTXhLJAx9qcLneyOJD-9xaBs7JqCPeA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

All points noted.

WRT below 8.3kHz I'd like a clear unambiguous answer saying, as long as no interference to legitimate services caused, it is OK to use the frequencies freely. At 73kHz, likewise, it would be good to be told, that with some limits it is OK to experiment. If one wants to publicise/share results it is better to know it is OK to go ahead. Up to now ALL my VLF and LF work has beenm with very low ERPs.

73s

Roger G3XBM

On 11 February 2014 15:08, Dexter McIntyre W4DEX <[email protected]> wrote:

Warren Ziegler wrote:

John,

Good background information. A few years ago someone on the U.S. longwave reflector decided that it was a good idea to pepper the FCC with very pointed and specific questions.

Warren,

Was that the fellow who was building a monster coil for 1750M in his driveway?

Dex

http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/
http://qss2.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Fwd: Questions about 73kHz and sub 8.3kHz, Roger Lapthorn LF: RE: [rsgb_lf_group] Fwd: Questions about 73kHz and sub 8.3kHz, Rik Strobbe Re: LF: Fwd: Questions about 73kHz and sub 8.3kHz, Warren Ziegler Re: LF: Fwd: Questions about 73kHz and sub 8.3kHz, John Rabson Re: LF: Fwd: Questions about 73kHz and sub 8.3kHz, Warren Ziegler Re: LF: Fwd: Questions about 73kHz and sub 8.3kHz, John Rabson Re: LF: Fwd: Questions about 73kHz and sub 8.3kHz, Dexter McIntyre W4DEX Re: LF: Fwd: Questions about 73kHz and sub 8.3kHz, Roger Lapthorn <=

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: Fwd: Questions about 73kHz and sub 8.3kHz, Dexter McIntyre W4DEX
Next by Date:	LF: WSQ,A Weak Signal QSO mode for LF/MF, Steinar Aanesland
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: Fwd: Questions about 73kHz and sub 8.3kHz, Dexter McIntyre W4DEX
Next by Thread:	LF: WSQ,A Weak Signal QSO mode for LF/MF, Steinar Aanesland
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]