Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+CW\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. LF: CW (score: 1)
Author: Mal Hamilton <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 17:14:26 +0100
Anyone about for CW 473 kcs G3KEV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-09/msg00022.html (7,926 bytes)

2. LF: CW (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:31:34 +0100
Hi All! Andy wrote:- Once took part in NFD (Farnborough club) station that came runner up on 80m back in the early 1980's. That was my first and one and only exposure to contest CW ever - wouldn't wa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00262.html (9,552 bytes)

3. LF: CW (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 23:07:15 +0100
I have been encouraging those interested in 137 khz acty to put out a signal and I will work them xband on 7025 khz. To date it seems that nobody is interested. The only activity seen this past coupl
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-08/msg00016.html (8,612 bytes)

4. LF: CW (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 17:37:49 +0100
Hi All The CW acty has got scarce again. I am active most days between 136 and 137 khz during daytime. Pse call if you hear me. 73 de Mal
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00076.html (7,725 bytes)

5. LF: CW (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 20:56:20 +0100
Anyone looking for a cw qso on 137 khz pse ck 136.950 khz. I work around this qrg normally but can qsy if necessary. Active during daytime and evenings. 73 de Mal/G3KEV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-06/msg00022.html (7,578 bytes)

6. LF: CW (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 19:26:39 +0100
Hi All Anyone that would like a cw qso look out for G3KEV. I call cq frequently but acty is poor. I am active most weekends and during the week. Acty from the south coast G is now nil, even eu acty i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-09/msg00151.html (7,669 bytes)

7. Re: LF: CW (score: 1)
Author: "John RABSON" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 17:18:53 +0200
I don't think you live in a caving area, so you are unlikely to have heard me on any of the low frequency allocations (in the amateur or other services) which I have used. CW and 136kHz are not the b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-10/msg00372.html (8,508 bytes)

8. LF: CW (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2006 19:51:57 +0100
A lot of cw acty today but the quality is getting worse, probably because of QRS and lack of manual operating which was the norm a few years ago when the band first got going. PA0KDM was a good sig o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-10/msg00373.html (8,277 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu