Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: CW

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: CW
From: "John RABSON" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 17:18:53 +0200
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <000901c6ea38$b6d04b10$90d0fc3e@g3kev>
References: <000901c6ea38$b6d04b10$90d0fc3e@g3kev>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
On 07/10/2006 at 17:47 hamilton mal wrote:

>Suprisingly a lot of contributers on here expressing opinions about LF etc
>have never been heard active on the band, therefore no real experience
>about
>the subject.
I don't think you live in a caving area, so you are unlikely to have heard me 
on any of the low frequency allocations (in the amateur or other services) 
which I have used.

CW and 136kHz are not the be-all and end-all of low frequency radio 
investigations.

John
G3PAI/F5VLF




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>