To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: CW |
From: | "John RABSON" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 08 Oct 2006 17:18:53 +0200 |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <000901c6ea38$b6d04b10$90d0fc3e@g3kev> |
References: | <000901c6ea38$b6d04b10$90d0fc3e@g3kev> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
On 07/10/2006 at 17:47 hamilton mal wrote: >Suprisingly a lot of contributers on here expressing opinions about LF etc >have never been heard active on the band, therefore no real experience >about >the subject. I don't think you live in a caving area, so you are unlikely to have heard me on any of the low frequency allocations (in the amateur or other services) which I have used. CW and 136kHz are not the be-all and end-all of low frequency radio investigations. John G3PAI/F5VLF |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Russian stations on 137.77, Dmitri |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Weekend activity, Hartmut Wolff |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: CW, captbrian |
Next by Thread: | LF: TA 7 Oct, John Andrews |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |