Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Big\s+vs\s+small\s+RX\s+antennas\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Big vs small RX antennas (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:02:11 +0100
Can't see any arguments against my version. But apart from telling that you disagree, you don't give any related reasons. I already agree to the balance, but using a balanced amplifier for a balanced
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00184.html (10,716 bytes)

2. RE: LF: Big vs small RX antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:01:44 -0500
Not so sure about the balanced pre-amp, it doesn't makes double balance, only one stage should be centered, when the aerial is balanced - the connection to one side is just as good as balanced connec
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00193.html (10,486 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Big vs small RX antennas (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:47:46 +0100
Not so sure about the balanced pre-amp, it doesn't makes double balance, only one stage should be centered, when the aerial is balanced - the connection to once side is just as good as balanced conne
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00194.html (14,140 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Big vs small RX antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Dexter McIntyre W4DEX" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 01:40:10 +0000
The first 136 kHz US receptions of G3AQC and M&Oslash;BMU made nearly two years ago were made with my 160 meter dipole. The dipole is supported with a 1 meter side arm from the 95 foot level of a 100
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00206.html (11,106 bytes)

5. LF: Big vs small RX antennas (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:47:32 EST
Hi John and LF group, Just curious -- since the signal to noise ratio in my receiving installation appears to be limited by external (man-made and atmospheric) noise, rather than noise in my preamp/r
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00208.html (9,345 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu