To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Big vs small RX antennas |
From: | [email protected] |
Date: | Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:47:32 EST |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Hi John and LF group,Just curious -- since the signal to noise ratio in my receiving installation A big vertical does help a lot against local noise-sources (neighbours' TVs and SMPSs), but with anything originating further away than a couple of 100m, it makes absolutely no difference. However the directivity provided by a magnetic receive loop can be valuable. If all of the noise was coming in isotropically from the horizon, the figure-eight pattern would theoretically have 3dB better SNR than a vertical, and a cardioid combination would gain 4.8dB. In practice, of course one can often null out a source of QRM or a thunderstorm front and have far greater improvement. The only problem I am having with small loops is that they seem to be much more prone to local pickup than the E-field antenna - at least in my suburban area which has underground mains wiring. The 86cm-diameter pair in the garden is often swamped by notorious 100Hz-modulated carriers which at the same time I can hardly see on the marconi. 73 de Markus, DF6NM |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: 500kHz (600m) allocations, Michael Silvers |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: Jason/antennas, Vernall |
Previous by Thread: | LF: 500kHz (600m) allocations, Michael Silvers |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Big vs small RX antennas, Dexter McIntyre W4DEX |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |