Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Below\s+8\.3kHz\s+in\s+the\s+UK\s+freuency\s+allocations\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:06:47 +0000
Quoting from the entry in the published UK frequency allocations table: "Bands below 8.3 kHz are not allocated within the United Kingdom" In the UK I take this to mean ANYONE can operate below 8.3kHz
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00116.html (11,932 bytes)

2. RE: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations (score: 1)
Author: "Terry GW0EZY" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 19:33:31 +0100
Hi Roger and Eddie The only &#8220;safe&#8221; interpretation is to ask OFCOM. If enough people ask perhaps they&#8217;ll include it in the licensing FAQs. There is quite a bit of info on the Ofcom a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00387.html (26,447 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:51:51 +0100
....the positive part is that; If you get arrested, because of the allocation regulations law trouble, you are not taken seriously when you say you'r broadcasting at ~8270.000 Hertz and therefore you
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00545.html (15,461 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations (score: 1)
Author: David Hine <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 19:18:55 +0000 (GMT)
Hi Roger On 28/01/2014 14:06, Roger Lapthorn wrote: Quoting from the entry in the published UK frequency allocations table: "Bands below 8.3 kHz are not allocated within the United Kingdom" In the U
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00546.html (15,697 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 22:39:00 +0000
Laura, Roger, but then, why not transmit on 8.9 kHz? Or 30 kHz, or any other unused frequency? The ERP we can achieve on (V)LF will anyhow be so weak that no one will notice it, unless he's really lo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00547.html (15,933 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:34:13 +0100
PPS: ...or is there any addition to the regulation that an antenna system must be resonated to the fundamental frequency of the transmitter? Am 29.01.2014 15:32, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: PS: There is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00548.html (14,454 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:32:22 +0100
PS: There is no power limitation in that VLF range below 8.3 kHz, it is not even amateur radio by definition so we do not act as radio amateurs. Actually everyone can transmit in that range, at least
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00549.html (14,132 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:17:45 +0100
Ooooh, this is very intersting! :-) Does it mean that i can do VLF experiments at e.g. 18 kHz by generating a VERY distorted 6 kHz signal? The groundwave is at 6 kHz, i.e. below 8.3 kHz and i can ass
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00550.html (13,387 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:52:40 +0000
Hi Roger On 28/01/2014 14:06, Roger Lapthorn wrote: Quoting from the entry in the published UK frequency allocations table: "Bands below 8.3 kHz are not allocated within the United Kingdom" In the UK
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00551.html (12,444 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations (score: 1)
Author: David Hine <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:07:39 +0000 (GMT)
Hi Roger On 28/01/2014 14:06, Roger Lapthorn wrote: Quoting from the entry in the published UK frequency allocations table: "Bands below 8.3 kHz are not allocated within the United Kingdom" In the U
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00552.html (14,850 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu