Some of you will remember that there was a discussion about the best choice of frequencies for slow-CW at last October's LF Forum (at the RSGB Internations HF & IOTA Convention). Since then RSGB and
John, I am answering your request to suggest a band plan for our small longwave band throught the reflector, since I believe that a discussion would help to come to an agreement. I read about the rec
At 10:06 10/07/99 +0100, G3WKL wrote: You may also prefer that we adopt the narrower the high-frequency allocation, that is 137.65kHz to 137.75kHz. As long as traffic on 136kHz is at the actual level
From HB9ASB, JN36pt I think our LF-Band is to narrow to waste some space at the edges or to reserve band space for future modes. For a well equipped station it is absolutely no problem to operate 5 H
What ever happens please keep it simple. I am answering your request to suggest a band plan for our small longwave band throught the reflector, since I believe that a discussion would help to come to
Agreed ... complex band plans will not be memorized (and respected). The upper 200 Hz for QRSS are fine for me. Also the lower side for testing and short-time beaconing. The lower 300 Hz are unusabl
From Dave G3YMC <Regarding the B.W. of the antennas: It's interesting that some stations <have antennas with only 200Hz B.W. How do you get this high Q-value? My <antenna covers the whole band and I'
