Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Amtor\s+FEC\s+on\s+LF\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Amtor\s+FEC\s+on\s+LF\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. RE: LF: Amtor FEC on LF (score: 1): Author: "Holger 'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 05:58:10 -0400; Hi Group, Is WOLF going to operate as a Windows program this year??? ... in a world without borders and fences, who needs windows and gates ... ;-) 73 Geri, DK8KW (W1KW) P.S.: I am happy to see that; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-07/msg00197.html (9,096 bytes)
2. RE: LF: Amtor FEC on LF (score: 1): Author: "Andy talbot" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:27:04 +0100; Certainly hope not ! Putting a windows interface around anything usually damages it. Andy G4JNT Is WOLF going to operate as a Windows program this year??? http://www.we0h.us/lf.html What hapenned to; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-07/msg00198.html (10,250 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Amtor FEC on LF (score: 1): Author: "David Willmore" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:20:43 -0500; Is WOLF going to operate as a Windows program this year??? If someone would like to create a windows interface for it, sure. I have no plans to do so, but I do plan on making the WOLF code into a nic; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-07/msg00199.html (9,957 bytes)
4. RE: LF: Amtor FEC on LF (score: 1): Author: "WE0H" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:01:20 -0500; Is WOLF going to operate as a Windows program this year??? http://www.we0h.us/lf.html What hapenned to WOLF ? That had very heavy convolution and repetition and would solve the problem very effective; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-07/msg00200.html (10,522 bytes)
5. RE: LF: Amtor FEC on LF (score: 1): Author: "Roger Thompson" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:46:00 -0500; Andy and all, I've been researching how a peak clipper might be implemented in an analog LF receiver chain before the narrowband filters, similar to your suggestion about taking noise pulses out usin; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-07/msg00202.html (11,727 bytes)
6. Re: LF: Amtor FEC on LF (score: 1): Author: "David Willmore" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:07:19 -0500; What hapenned to WOLF ? That had very heavy convolution and repetition and would solve the problem very effectively by coding. WOLF has undergone some surgery and is now in recovery and resting comfo; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-07/msg00203.html (10,040 bytes)
7. RE: LF: Amtor FEC on LF (score: 1): Author: "Andy talbot" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:58:39 +0100; OK then, so we need a waveform that is immune to high level broadband spikes. Narrow filtering will remove the spike energy, but in turn will spread it out over the period of the filter response so w; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-07/msg00205.html (13,965 bytes)
8. RE: LF: Amtor FEC on LF (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 12:29:02 +0100; Dear Andy, LF Group, At 08:52 10/07/2002 +0100, you wrote: 137k, on the other hand is characterised by a much more constant noise background and does not behave like HF divided by ten - if fading is; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-07/msg00207.html (12,774 bytes)
9. RE: LF: Amtor FEC on LF (score: 1): Author: "Andy talbot" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 08:52:35 +0100; is over 100 km away, so it does not cause the same trouble you might have in areas such as the U.K. but helps to fill the band at least with some signals .... ;-) But scaled down Amtor (divide by 10; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-07/msg00210.html (11,392 bytes)
10. Re: LF: Amtor FEC on LF (score: 1): Author: "Stewart Bryant" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 17:49:57 +0100; Andy, ... well, Andy, you are definetely right, AMTOR is by far not an optimum mode for LF, but here in Northern Germany, the LF population density is very low, my next active LF neighbor is over 10; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-07/msg00217.html (10,104 bytes)
11. LF: Amtor FEC on LF (score: 1): Author: "'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 00:14:08 -0400; Andy, Isn't AMTOR / RTTY a rather wide and dirty mode to be using on LF ? 170 Hz shift transmitting 100 Baud is at least 300 Hz wide......... ... well, Andy, you are definetely right, AMTOR is by far; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-07/msg00226.html (9,531 bytes)
12. LF: Amtor FEC on LF (score: 1): Author: "Andy talbot" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 13:03:03 +0100; Isn't AMTOR / RTTY a rather wide and dirty mode to be using on LF ? 170 Hz shift transmitting 100 Baud is at least 300 Hz wide......... Andy G4JNT version of MixW2. Olaf on the other side used a G3PL; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-07/msg00231.html (9,074 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]