Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Activity\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Activity (score: 1)
Author: lawrence mayhead <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 14:55:49 +0100
Dear All, I am concerned at the lack of activity on 500kHz. I am not a great "chin wagger" but it would be nice hear a signal now and again.! Could we have an activity period ? say 18:00 to 18:30 cal
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-05/msg00316.html (9,591 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Activity (score: 1)
Author: Andrej <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:45:00 +0300
Hello Mike, lf This is good news. What is the mode, QRSS/DFCW? And the dot length? If the stations are interested in inband QSOs after 19z, what frequency will they listen on? I strongly suggest spli
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00057.html (8,939 bytes)

3. LF: Activity (score: 1)
Author: Andrej <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:08:18 +0300
Hello, We are planning Easter LF activity like in 2009. Date is 3 april 2010. Most stations will give beacons at 17-19Z: 137800 - RD4HU 137779.1 - UA0AET 137778.7 - RA9CUA 137778.3 - RA3YO 137777.9 -
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00071.html (7,982 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Activity (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:01:34 +0100
This is good news. What is the mode, QRSS/DFCW? And the dot length? If the stations are interested in inband QSOs after 19z, what frequency will they listen on? I strongly suggest split frequency, pe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00225.html (8,995 bytes)

5. LF: Activity (score: 1)
Author: "Brian Rogerson" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 09:54:03 +0000
I received signals in both the 136KHz and the 73KHz slots during the last 24hrs. 73, Brian 73 Brian CT1DRP IN51QD 41 09 58N 08 39 11W http://homepage.esoterica.pt/~brian
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-09/msg00007.html (7,540 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Activity (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Boucher" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 08:01:40 +0100
Hello Urban I will look for you at 0600 and again at 0900 UTC tomorrow 20/07/02. Like you, I don't have time to spend hours and hours CQing to myself on 136! 73, Tom G3OLB Instead of writing a lot of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-07/msg00139.html (9,129 bytes)

7. LF: Activity (score: 1)
Author: "Urban ekholm" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 21:18:26 +0200
HI All ! Instead of writing a lot of rubbish on this reflector, how about some activity on the band ? I was on calling a lot of CQ:s on last sunday , monday and tuesday evenings between ~19 and 21Z a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-07/msg00146.html (9,227 bytes)

8. LF: Activity (score: 1)
Author: "Urban Ekholm" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 09:03:22 +0200
I will be QRV this afternoon from JO78SQ from about 1230Z and a couple of hours on136.5 CW and probably also on 137.675 QRSS3. Hope for the first QRSS-QSO ! 73 de SM5EUF/5 - Urban
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00223.html (7,684 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Activity (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Boucher" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 07:47:13 +0100
Ian Thanks for the nice report. Look forward to working you on LF. 73, Tom G3OLB
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00243.html (8,146 bytes)

10. LF: Activity (score: 1)
Author: "Ian Kyle" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 18:42:34 +0100
This afternoon, while characterising the long delayed LF antenna now draped artistically all round the garden (looks like 10 microhenries and 1000pFas the first approximation), I was delighted to hea
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00279.html (8,200 bytes)

11. LF: activity (score: 1)
Author: "Ian Kyle" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 00:20:16 +0100
Back into the shack and in business again - at least for a while. RU6LA and S57AM good signals QRSS and copiable aurally between 2100 & 2230 here. Called both but no luck with only 1A into the antenn
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-02/msg00223.html (7,890 bytes)

12. LF: Activity (score: 1)
Author: "Urban Ekholm" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 20:41:12 +0200
Hello LF-ers ! Isn't it time we settle a time for activity instead of that a lot of us mostly in vain call endless CQ:s after having listened for a while to a dead band ? My suggestions are 0800-1000
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00165.html (8,459 bytes)

13. LF: Activity (score: 1)
Author: "Laurie Mayhead" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 14:03:19 +0100
Peter G3LDO telephoned this morning to say that he is QRV from Marrakesh. He is hearing signals on HF but would appreciate some activity on LF. He can hear(see?) CFH. He will be in touch later with d
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-10/msg00118.html (7,851 bytes)

14. Re: LF: activity (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 17:35:10 +0100
In LF parlance how slow is "QRS" please. I have tuned over 136 countless times and heard an amateur cw signal only once. I guess I am among those who have deserted the band for this among other reaso
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00033.html (10,000 bytes)

15. Re: LF: activity (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 16:11:38 +0100
I saw GI8AYZ on QRS testing yesterday with a good strong audible signal, also OM2TW on QRS audible. Why QRS with good strong signals perfectly workable on CW. A lot of LF ops have deserted the band
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00044.html (9,737 bytes)

16. LF: activity (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 13:43:13 +0100
I saw GI8AYZ on QRS testing yesterday with a good strong audible signal, also OM2TW on QRS audible. Why QRS with good strong signals perfectly workable on CW. A lot of LF ops have deserted the band b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00101.html (8,957 bytes)

17. LF: activity (score: 1)
Author: Kölpin Thomas <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 11:16:30 +0100
Hello dear LF group, in the last days the discussion about QRSS vs. normal CW came up again. Of course Mal, Brian, Dave and all the others are right: normal CW should be the first choice to make cont
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-12/msg00139.html (9,780 bytes)

18. LF: Activity (score: 1)
Author: F5MAF FREE <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 17:54:55 +0200
Hi all, Any activity this morning in QRSS mode? 73 marc
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-09/msg00135.html (8,347 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu