Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+8\.970\.025Khz\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: 8.970.025Khz (score: 1)
Author: "henny van elst" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 14:40:50 +0100
Tu Eddie for monitoring, the tx is still on henny pa3cpm 73's -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] [email protected] To: [email protected] [email protected] Sent: Tues
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00017.html (13,691 bytes)

2. Re: LF: 8.970.025Khz (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 15:05:49 +0100
Gary Except a signal is extremely stable your bandwidth is too narrow. Most I have observed so far are not stable. mal/g3kev -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Gary - G4WGT To: rsgb_lf_
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00026.html (14,197 bytes)

3. Re: LF: 8.970.025Khz (score: 1)
Author: "henny van elst" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:27:37 +0100
Tu Roger, the tx is still on henny pa3cpm 73's -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Roger Lapthorn To: [email protected] [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, March 0
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00028.html (11,484 bytes)

4. Re: LF: 8.970.025Khz (score: 1)
Author: "henny van elst" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 00:23:13 +0100
Yes I do Eddie, tu henny pa3cpm 73's -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] [email protected] To: [email protected] [email protected] Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 11:49
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00061.html (10,916 bytes)

5. Re: LF: 8.970.025Khz (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:19:24 +0100
Have u seen my sig generator around 8970 yet. It might be drifting around 8970 a bit mal/g3kev -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Gary - G4WGT To: [email protected] rsgb_lf_g
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00117.html (19,423 bytes)

6. Re: LF: 8.970.025Khz (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:44:25 +0100
Gary es Co Apart from antennas etc anyone a couple of hz off frequency will not be seen, and like I said what I have seen so far are not that stable The aim surely on 9 kcs is to generate a reasonabl
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00137.html (19,685 bytes)

7. Re: LF: 8.970.025Khz (score: 1)
Author: Gerhard Hickl <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 20:59:12 +0100
Mal and group! "A couple of Hz"....is way too much off for seriously transmitting on VLF at low speeds. And low speeds are mostly required to detect the signal. A drift of 100mHz is the minimum requi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00186.html (22,166 bytes)

8. Re: LF: 8.970.025Khz (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 13:32:25 +0000
I will continue to monitoring. I have several short dashes composted of several pixels which are 2-3dB stronger than the noise, timed between 01.00 UTC and 05.00 UTC and around10.00 UTC spot on frequ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00202.html (13,108 bytes)

9. Re: LF: 8.970.025Khz (score: 1)
Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 12:07:07 +0000
Tu Roger,   the tx is still on henny pa3cpm 73's -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Roger Lapthorn To: [email protected] [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, Marc
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00291.html (13,996 bytes)

10. Re: LF: 8.970.025Khz (score: 1)
Author: "henny van elst" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:25:51 +0100
Ok Stefan,the tx is still on,the freq.is very stable,sri,i can only make steps of 0,1hz. so not on your 60000 grabber, henny cpm 73 -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Stefan
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00301.html (11,105 bytes)

11. Re: LF: 8.970.025Khz (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 21:15:43 +0100
Mal . You could try invisible ros -vlf , just need some one to send it at the other end , that even has a AFC , so no problem drifting the night away as the song say's https://sites.google.com/site/u
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00303.html (21,114 bytes)

12. Re: LF: 8.970.025Khz (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 10:05:38 +0100
Hello Henny, Sorry, nothing so far. But 6 dB QRO is a good idea :-) Do you have an estimate how stable your frequency is? Looking forward to see a trace. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 07.03.2011 22:47, schrieb
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00318.html (10,118 bytes)

13. Re: LF: 8.970.025Khz (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 21:10:46 +0100
Gerhard In that case I will not bother with 9 kcs. I cannot wait all day or all month for a trace on a screen g3kev http://dl.dropbox.com/u/15990181/9khz.jpg [email protected] wrote: freq.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00499.html (21,558 bytes)

14. Re: LF: 8.970.025Khz (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 15:43:45 +0100
That is why they see nothing except local signals. I copied OE5ODL and DK7FC in QRS3. mal/vg3kev -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Gary - G4WGT To: [email protected] rsgb_lf
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00541.html (16,800 bytes)

15. Re: LF: 8.970.025Khz (score: 1)
Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 14:22:57 +0000
Gary Except a signal is extremely stable your bandwidth is too narrow. Most I have observed so far are not stable. mal/g3kev   -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Gary - G4WGT To: rsgb_
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00549.html (16,314 bytes)

16. Re: LF: 8.970.025Khz (score: 1)
Author: Gerhard Hickl <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 21:52:23 +0100
Mal! I completely understand and respect your statement. A few month ago, QRSS60 or anything slower was out of my imagination but meanwhile I'm happy if a sign of my signal is seen at much lower spee
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00607.html (23,719 bytes)

17. Re: LF: 8.970.025Khz (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:49:28 +0000
Hi Henny I am taking a look for you, are you TXing overnight? 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 07/03/2011 21:47, henny van elst wrote: Hi LF, The tx is on, freq.8.970.025Khz antenne curent 200mA, Henny pa3cpm 73's
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00618.html (9,919 bytes)

18. Re: LF: 8.970.025Khz (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 08:35:51 +0000
Hi LF, The tx is on, freq.8.970.025Khz antenne curent 200mA, Henny pa3cpm 73's
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00722.html (11,366 bytes)

19. Re: LF: 8.970.025Khz (score: 1)
Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 15:12:17 +0000
That is why they see nothing except local signals. I copied OE5ODL and DK7FC in QRS3. mal/vg3kev     -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Gary - G4WGT To: [email protected] rs
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00853.html (18,835 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu