Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+500\s+opera\s+V\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. LF: 500 opera V (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:15:11 +0100
MF On 500 Khz so far signals decoded in Opera mode have been visible on the waterfall therefore had the mode been QRSS the result would have probably been better and quicker in QRS 3 - 10 The mode is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00142.html (8,960 bytes)

2. Re: LF: 500 opera V (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:54:34 +0100
R Mal Those signals where about 10 db over the limit , so will show , OP16 , is about 6 dB lower again. but a decode is a decode.. good start. 14:44 500 G3ZJO de G3KEV Op4 142 miles -22 dB in SCARBOR
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00153.html (10,955 bytes)

3. Re: LF: 500 opera V (score: 1)
Author: qrss <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:37:06 +0000
Hey Mal I hope you are sitting down. I must tell you, I had a Morse QSO c.12WPM on 500kHz yesterday morning with G3XIZ and very enjoyable it was too. My QRP Rig is my own design home built with a hom
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00194.html (18,892 bytes)

4. Re: LF: 500 opera V (score: 1)
Author: qrss <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:24:44 +0000
So Mal Can you see or hear my 12WPM Morse ident between my OPERA signals? I doubt it. I could put QRS3 between, that would be a good test. Say a cryptic message for decipher, one transmission and tha
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00230.html (12,240 bytes)

5. Re: LF: 500 opera V (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:17:21 +0100
It is hard to believe that you can only get a 5 metre inv L into your property. How about going upwards towards the sky. Try a 10 metre telescopic fishing rod at least that is twice what you have at
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00404.html (18,814 bytes)

6. Re: LF: 500 opera V (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 22:18:42 +0100
R Mal Try a ping on 136 OP8 SV8 and RV9 monitoring .. Tnx - G.. From: mal hamilton Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 8:47 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: LF: 500 opera V Ok Graham Inter
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00473.html (13,120 bytes)

7. Re: LF: 500 opera V (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 06:59:55 -0500 (EST)
Eddie, my guess is that in the "Opera vs QRSS" challenge, Mal's odds wouldn't be bad at all: Graham stated that Opera-8 should decode above SNR -32 dB in 2.5 kHz (average). Referenced to 1 Hz, this i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00487.html (14,581 bytes)

8. Re: LF: 500 opera V (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:49:17 +0100
Eddie Om There is your answer from a MAN that knows g3kev -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Markus Vester To: [email protected] [email protected] Sent: Monday, J
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00507.html (15,381 bytes)

9. Re: LF: 500 opera V (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:48:26 +0100
I ignore on/off keyed data normally because on 500 Khz around EU with a half reasonable signal CW does the trick. also I do not report Beacon acty. At present I am comparing Opera v QRS to get first
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00618.html (18,237 bytes)

10. Re: LF: 500 opera V (score: 1)
Author: qrss <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:32:41 +0000
Its a definite problem, but then you have got to think about what is going on 100% of the time on RX. E On 30/01/2012 16:19, mal hamilton wrote: Opera is severe on the CPU,  mine is around 70 % and p
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00681.html (21,722 bytes)

11. Re: LF: 500 opera V (score: 1)
Author: qrss <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:53:40 +0000
Hi Markus No Mal, Markus said its his Guess not the Answer :-) Of course Marcus the figures stack up so I have to agree, in fact practice agrees at this very moment as I stare at my monitor displayin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00814.html (18,382 bytes)

12. Re: LF: 500 opera V (score: 1)
Author: qrss <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:30:18 +0000
Mal I have many other antennas squeezed in from a 40m doublet to 23cm beams, I also have neighbours who are excellent but I need to be reasonable about what I erect, I also have an XYL. When will you
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00826.html (22,884 bytes)

13. Re: LF: 500 opera V (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:05:47 +0100
Scared of neighbours es XYL now the secret is OUT !!!!! -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] qrss To: [email protected] [email protected] Sent: Monday, January 30, 201
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00841.html (21,725 bytes)

14. Re: LF: 500 opera V (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:50:58 +0100
Opera is severe on the CPU, mine is around 70 % and peaks 90 at times mal/g3kev -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] qrss To: [email protected] [email protected] Sent:
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00916.html (18,411 bytes)

15. Re: LF: 500 opera V (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:48:51 +0100
Ok Graham Interesting but now QRT testing and over to DX hunting cul tnx de mal/g3kev -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Graham To: [email protected] rsgb_lf_group@blacks
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg01017.html (11,978 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu