Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:: 562 ]

Total 562 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Wanted Software to 'Grab' ' Grabbers' (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:06:24 -0400
Graham ON7YD's "Rapido" should answer your needs. http://www.qsl.net/on7yd/software_main.htm John Andrews, W1TAG
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-09/msg00145.html (8,730 bytes)

2. Re: LF: 137kHz 16/17th Sep (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:49:46 -0400
Laurence, With some imagination, that does look like an S on the left and most of an X on the right. The frequencies are certainly right. Was the clock time (off as it may be) supposed to be UTC? Int
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-09/msg00152.html (8,885 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: 500kHz 22/23 Sep (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:43:33 +0100
Dave, Is there any documented information on the detail of applying forward error correction to PSK31? We are using F6CTE's MultiPSK program: http://f6cte.free.fr/index_anglais.htm Patrick has a pape
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-09/msg00211.html (8,587 bytes)

4. Re: LF: A question of calibration (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:37:32 -0400
Andy, all, Last year, I did a MathCad analysis of the fields from a small vertical and a small magnetic loop at 137 kHz. The program calculated the vector E and H fields, and the magnitude of E/H for
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-09/msg00220.html (11,522 bytes)

5. Re: LF: A question of calibration (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:40:13 -0400
Malcolm, Hi. Can anyone reassure me. Be reassured. Your meter is measuring the magnetic field, and the calibration setup is primarily generating a magnetic field. The cal is being done under near-fie
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-09/msg00249.html (9,986 bytes)

6. Re: LF: MFJ259B (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:24:10 -0400
Mal, The harmonic content of a divider's rectangular waveform would be a problem for the wideband detector circuitry in the analyzer. The waveform is typically not an issue for a classic bridge with
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00028.html (9,509 bytes)

7. LF: DI2AM in Massachusetts (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 02:13:24 +0100
I had good QRSS3 copy of DI2AM tonight on 505.182 kHz at 0207 UTC. John Andrews, W1TAG FN42ch JPEG image
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00059.html (7,818 bytes)

8. Re: LF: 1600m Beacon (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 12:15:11 +0100
Joe, I'd make the frequency as a little higher than that, about 187.37043, according to the attached shot from this morning. John A. Joe Craig wrote: After surprisingly little colourful language, the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00083.html (12,037 bytes)

9. Re: LF: MF acty (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:11:05 +0100
I dearly love subscribing to this list, absent the periodic "harrumps" from those insisting that most of us are well down the road to perdition. Anyway, please allow a suggestion. I recall nothing in
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00132.html (11,124 bytes)

10. Re: LF: slv and dpe, xgj and xes (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:38:27 -0400
Laurence, Thanks for the report. I had not planned to run last night, but saw Warren's signal, and thought it would be interesting to make some comparisons. There will be no WD2XES operation for the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00346.html (8,482 bytes)

11. Re: LF: PE1RRF test, (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 23:19:13 +0100
Frank, I am seeing a keyed carrier on 136.3205 at 2315 UTC. I will keep watching. John Andrews, W1TAG FN42ch
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00366.html (8,366 bytes)

12. Re: LF: MF acty (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:42:42 -0400
Mal, My previous message must have escaped YOU. Be assured that none of your messages have escaped me. I actually look forward to your return every three months. Perhaps it takes that long to replace
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00422.html (9,454 bytes)

13. Re: LF: 503.95 "WC" (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:23:57 -0500
John, Doen anyone know the source of a CW ident I can hear on 503.95 sending "WC WC" ? Possibly a distress call from someone with a full bladder? John A.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00060.html (9,344 bytes)

14. Re: LF: XES et al (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:27:12 -0500
Warren, His sunrise now is at 2247 UTC, and sunset at 1050 UTC. So he presently has a common-darkness window on one path to us for about an hour and 10 minutes after our sunset, and on the other path
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00212.html (8,845 bytes)

15. Re: LF: QSW/QTV (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 13:20:14 +0000
If that looks like a lot of double talk, gobbledegook Q'ness then suggest you peruse.... An incomplete list...didn't even have "QLF" (now try sending with your LEFT foot). John A.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00251.html (8,976 bytes)

16. LF: 137 kHz band - WRC07 (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:02:42 -0400
I've been trying to post various versions of the following to the U.S. lowfer reflector for a half hour, but they are always rejected as spam. I'll post it here! An allocation at 135.7-137.8 kHz is s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00283.html (9,283 bytes)

17. Re: LF: E-mail met bijlage (attachment): 0511 who.jpg (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 09:31:31 -0500
Henny, Thanks for the XES report. The signal on 137.7774 is WD2XKO (W4DEX op). John Andrews, W1TAG
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00336.html (8,829 bytes)

18. Re: LF: 137 kHz Propagation Tonite (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 11:54:34 +0000
Jean-Pierre, Jay and I are both running 1 watt ERP. I was only on the air for about 30 minutes last night. Warren's signal appears to have increased in the last week. John Andrews, W1TAG/WD2XES
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00404.html (9,827 bytes)

19. Re: LF: Re: 500 KHz test (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 18:55:20 +0000
All class A UK radio amateurs have passed the code test, so why bother with a mode that noone else bothers about. Better yet, use spark, so the chaps with crystal sets aren't excluded. John Andrews,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00461.html (9,899 bytes)

20. Re: LF: Re: WSJT JT2 Test tonight (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 13:54:56 +0000
Gary, I'm still pretty green at this, but it looks like there just wasn't enough signal. The "*" at the end of the line indicates a lock, but the message decoding is an all or nothing process. If the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-12/msg00067.html (9,913 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu