Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:


References: [ +from:: 147 ]

Total 147 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: OE Activity Report of November 27 (score: 1)
Author: "malcolmg3kev" <>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 15:23:38 +0000
Hi Heinz. I was pleased to read your message about your activities on LF last weekend. I was also pleased that you could hear my signal at 539. I always listen very carefully but did not hear anythin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00000.html (11,266 bytes)

2. LF: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: "malcolmg3kev" <>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 1999 13:54:43 +0000
Hi Graham. Sri I do not have an e-mail address for you direct. QSP fm OE5ODL. He heard your signal fm GD3XTZ/P at 439 211199/1000utc He heard me also at 549 on the same day. I hope the above info is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00042.html (8,372 bytes)

3. LF: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: "malcolmg3kev" <>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 1999 13:52:13 +0000
Re-Insulators Surely no one can be serious about the contraptions suggested for insulators carrying high voltages. Is this a Mellenium wind up. If you cannot get proper antenna insulators from the no
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00043.html (9,643 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Lowfer's Net - sunday 12 december (score: 1)
Author: "malcolmg3kev" <>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 19:13:04 +0000
Re-A single ant to use on all bands. Don't do it, especially on VLF. Use a single antenna for each band. It is difficult enough to get max efficiency on 136 using an antenna specifically built for th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00054.html (12,135 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Lowfer's Net - sunday 12 december (score: 1)
Author: "malcolmg3kev" <>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 18:54:41 +0000
Re - experimenters band. The Broadcaster fraternity and Admirality engineers pioneered, and have been using the Low frequencies for 50 years very successfuly. We Radio Amateurs in 1999 are merely re-
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00060.html (10,280 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: re-inventing the wheel (score: 1)
Author: "malcolmg3kev" <>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 20:19:24 +0000
Hi Peter. But there is still nothing to beat an old signal generator and an audio amplifier and a piece of wet string. (Your illustration in the lf book). Why change for the sake of it. It takes a lo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00067.html (9,802 bytes)

7. LF: Re-Rik Strobbe (score: 1)
Author: "malcolmg3kev" <>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 20:07:58 +0000
Rik. No one has suggested that experimenting on 136 khz should stop. Your Broadcast friend was amazed that you should try 1w ERP for communications on LF. He is not well informed. Marine Radio/Electo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00068.html (8,506 bytes)

8. Re: LF: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: "malcolmg3kev" <>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 18:52:52 +0000
Re-Ropes, insulators. Hi Tom. You are correct, anything out side will suffer eventually, it will either rust, corrode or in the case of the ropes discussed will degrade and get brittle. They should b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00077.html (10,296 bytes)

9. Re: LF: getting permission OK (score: 1)
Author: "malcolmg3kev" <>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 19:21:15 +0000
Hi Petr. I had a similar experience in Canada. I phoned the Telecoms Dept in Vancouver and asked what the procedure was for getting a recipocal licence. The Inspector said JUST go ahead and transmit.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00078.html (12,482 bytes)

10. LF: CRAB POT SPINNERS (score: 1)
Author: "malcolmg3kev" <>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 19:10:54 +0000
Hi All. Crab Pot Spinners alias INSULATORS. These are available at marine suppliers and are ideal for insulators. They are white and appear to be made from a plastic type material and look like a dog
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00086.html (8,771 bytes)

11. LF: new (score: 1)
Author: "malcolmg3kev" <>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 19:17:58 +0000
Two new ones recently worked dj8wx and pa0kdm, but maybe someone else has worked them before. Mal/G3KEV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00087.html (7,537 bytes)

12. LF: qrss (score: 1)
Author: "malcolmg3kev" <>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 19:11:37 +0000
Hi All. Can anyone explain to me why qrss is necessary on 136 khz. All the activity that I have heard on this frequency is workable on normal speed cw at my qth. I could understand the use of this mo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00100.html (9,026 bytes)

13. LF: RE -QRSS MSGS (score: 1)
Author: "malcolmg3kev" <>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 16:22:30 +0000
All messages appearing recently regarding QRSS are stating the obvious as regards the technicalities. ie signal over noise in a very narrow bandwidth. No one mentioned the big disadvantage of the tim
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00107.html (8,803 bytes)

14. Re: LF: qrss (score: 1)
Author: "malcolmg3kev" <>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 18:48:44 +0000
Mal, you and me are putting good signals in the air, for various reasons. However, there are several others who are far below the noise level. Hi Geri. Qrss is discouraging experimenters from improv
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00109.html (11,137 bytes)

15. Re: LF: RE -QRSS MSGS (score: 1)
Author: "malcolmg3kev" <>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 19:24:00 +0000
This has been mentioned quite a bit from the very first use of QRSS, actually. It was the principal reason for the recent development of DFCW. Or, if one is attempting longer distance than the availa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00110.html (12,283 bytes)

16. Re: LF: qrss (score: 1)
Author: "malcolmg3kev" <>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 16:38:46 +0000
MMM. Hello Mal, I am very sorry but I do not understand the reason of your anti-QRSS (or DFCW) campaign How can a debate or point of view be seen as being an ANTI CAMPAIN. This medium is exactly for
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00116.html (11,118 bytes)

17. Re: LF: The 137.0 signal ??? more (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2000 18:47:49 -0800
Hi All. The signal on 137 khz. I have heard this signal before. Yesterday it was about S5 about 1500/1700 utc and then it was about S8 during the evening 1900/2200utc. It could be spurious from anoth
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00028.html (11,048 bytes)

18. LF: CFH 137 (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2000 15:31:46 -0800
Now that the mystery signal on 137 khz has been confirmed as CFH. It was audible with me all day at S5 and during the early evening S8. I have heard it a number of times in the past. I wonder what rf
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00034.html (7,921 bytes)

19. LF: re cfh 137 (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2000 20:38:41 -0800
Not sure what sun cycle you are at in France. Your message today was dated 27 August 1956 at 21:06:24. Time warp or computer BUG. Solar cycle peak/trough every 11.25 years would possible have a less
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00037.html (7,719 bytes)

20. Re: LF: QSL cards posted (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2000 19:03:17 -0800
Hi Petr. Address for G3KEV Tyrone House 473 Scalby Rd Scarborough YO12 6UA England Glad u got my card 73 de Mal/G3KEV Hello Lowfers This morning I posted special L.F. QSL cards for: I5TGC, DK1IS, DJ7
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00045.html (8,344 bytes)

This search system is powered by Namazu