Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: LF Tuning meter (score: 1)
Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:23:19 -0400
Jim, Please send me the tuning meter pdf file. Thanks, Bill A PS: I hope the circuit takes into account the FACT that the phase relationship between current and voltage in a resistor can vary. (HA HA
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00026.html (8,448 bytes)

2. LF: RE: Re: RX-LOOP (score: 1)
Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 00:03:05 -0400
Alan, all: I suspect that you need to isolate the loop feed with a small transformer. It is possible that the feed from the loop is acting as a wire aerial and is conducting TV RFI and noises from th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00045.html (9,703 bytes)

3. LF: RE: Re: RE: Re: Amidon Cores (slightly diverging from topic) (score: 1)
Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 13:25:19 -0400
Mal, Hi Bill. I cannot wait much longer so pse hurry up with those big signals. My loop is in your direction, so between the loop and the vertical system I think I should hear you, hopefully the wind
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00086.html (9,842 bytes)

4. LF: RE: Re: Amidon Cores (slightly diverging from topic) (score: 1)
Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 17:13:48 -0400
Mal, So your advice is to: Never believe anything you hear or see!!!!!!!!! Is that how we should deal with statements relative to your own loop antenna measurements? BTW: Be prepared to apply your st
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00102.html (9,254 bytes)

5. RE: LF: No LF Band in US (score: 1)
Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 17:17:21 -0400
Andre, Did you mean to say "Part 5" licenses below? Bill A Are there experimental licenses of the UK type that extends the individual amateur's privileges on a case by case basis, or are they just fo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00055.html (10,046 bytes)

6. RE: LF: No US Ham Band (score: 1)
Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 12:41:44 -0400
Despite assurance from ARRL that an amateur would have to be within a few 100 yards of the line for there to be any problem, at which distance the power line QRM would be horrendous, FCC have gone al
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00079.html (10,761 bytes)

7. LF: RE: CFH Continues... (score: 1)
Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 11:01:53 -0400
CFH continues to operate on 137.0 kHz. They sure have my attention in Andover, MA! I'll take some readings on their signal now that my SVM is set up for the 137k area of the band. Any way of contacti
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00117.html (8,509 bytes)

8. RE: LF: Mains Cable and other transmission lines (score: 1)
Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 16:31:42 -0400
John A, With the proposed 100 watt transmitter output limit here in the U.S., we can be a little more conservative with audio amplifiers used as transmitter PA's. I have been playing with a nominal "
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00188.html (10,195 bytes)

9. RE: LF: Way off subject ... and totally batty (score: 1)
Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 15:53:00 -0400
Bob, I have put a microphone on my SLM and have been receiving bats. Be wary if they start using QRSS Especially if one of them inserts a slant marker to improve identification in a noisy environment
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00190.html (9,415 bytes)

10. LF: RE: Getting wires over trees (score: 1)
Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:48:45 -0400
Walter, I thought I was was the king of the arrow-shooting crowd but that crossbow beats me by almost 4X! Is this for a giant loop antenna? (missed the original post) I used to make my arrows as well
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-06/msg00058.html (9,698 bytes)

11. LF: RE: Re: Radials (score: 1)
Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 16:07:44 -0400
But what is the capacity of this old hat? Would two be better ? G3GVB Don't know, but I've heard that two heads are better than one. The one exception however is finding agreement on top hat capacity
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-08/msg00051.html (8,598 bytes)

12. RE: LF: beacon on (score: 1)
Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 22:43:52 -0400
Laurence, Are you saying that you have R = P/Isq = 70/(2)sq = 18 ohms for your total system resistance? If so, that would be very good. Thought you measured 50 ohms last week. Bill A WD2XDW Anchorage
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-08/msg00058.html (8,986 bytes)

13. LF: RE: Beacon (score: 1)
Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 10:32:45 -0400
Hi Laurence, deep deep in the thick forest lives a LF tranmitter with lossy vegetation The site here is surrounded by cotton woods, birches and firs. This evening I put out few 1/4Y radials, Yep some
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-08/msg00083.html (9,437 bytes)

14. RE: LF: RE: Re: 500m drums of coax dipole (score: 1)
Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:00:09 -0400
David, resonant antenna at these frequencies. Also I remember a QEX article a while ago that detailed underground dipoles used by USAF for emergency communication with aircraft. The efficiencies were
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-08/msg00090.html (8,844 bytes)

15. LF: RE: Re: 500m drums of coax dipole (score: 1)
Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 13:30:09 -0400
David, I hate to break the news to you but theory and loads of experimentation have shown that the horizontal portion of a wave this long is short-circuited by the ground surrounding the transmitting
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-08/msg00096.html (11,815 bytes)

16. LF: RE: Off air (score: 1)
Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 18:51:16 -0400
Laurence, Great story! Naturally this goes on the list of top 100 reasons why the loop is superior to the vertical. <GGGGGGGGGG> Bill A XDW was on very much reduced power for a few hours today. A pai
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-10/msg00012.html (8,258 bytes)

17. RE: LF: Start rsgb_lf_group? (score: 1)
Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:36:50 -0500
Hi Dex, I built the xmitter about 1965 after reading a an article in an electronics magazine about the Part 15 rules. A schematic was included using what I believe was a 6AQ5 for the power amp. So I'
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-11/msg00007.html (9,636 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu