Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:


References: [ +from:: 275 ]

Total 275 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Reflector e-mail (score: 1)
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 12:41:26 EST
Apparently all that's necessary to keep the reflector from cutting off messages is to make sure periods are only used at the end of a sentence, or otherwise make sure there are no spaces ahead of the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-03/msg00173.html (7,979 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Peter Bobek (score: 1)
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 12:27:55 EDT
The news is still hard to accept. On this side of the Atlantic, most of our contact with Peter was by e-mail, so I don't know if any of us realized he was ill. None the less, his pioneering efforts
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-04/msg00154.html (8,039 bytes)

3. Re: LF: PA0SE Field Strength Meter (score: 1)
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 13:11:39 EDT
<< To speed download it might be useful to ZIP the files into a single ZIP file. >> A good thought. We will be doing that at the site, where the information is also mirrored. In addition, we
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-07/msg00054.html (9,903 bytes)

4. Re: LF: PA0SE Field Strength Meter (score: 1)
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 23:20:23 EDT
<< Dear John, I visited the site and it looks really great! Text in white on black, wow.... Thanks again for a splendid job! 73, Dick, PA0SE >> You are most welcome, Dick. Thank you for making this e
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-07/msg00064.html (8,536 bytes)

5. Re: LF: ERP and all that jazz (score: 1)
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 10:45:15 EDT
<< Maybe it is better to avoid using e.r.p. at all. What you could use is e.i.r.p. . . . . >> Yes, I believe this is far better. EIRP is already the equivalent of the "eurowatt." It is the measure us
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-07/msg00106.html (9,303 bytes)

6. Re: LF: eclipse (score: 1)
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 12:34:24 EDT
If it may be any help in knowing what to expect from the eclipse, I can summarize some of the effects of the 1995 total solar eclipse over North America. That one entered the US from Mexico over west
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-08/msg00058.html (12,444 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Duplicate messages (score: 1)
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 14:36:15 EDT
<< Someone's system is resending rsgb_lf_group messages back to the list, causing a mail loop - I'm on the case. Sorry for any inconvenience. >> Thanks, Peter. Best of luck. It's summer re-run season
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-08/msg00147.html (7,852 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: Multiple Tuned Vertical (score: 1)
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 1999 00:29:21 EDT
<< When all 6 masts are parallelled at the top via the top-capacitance wires . . . >> can it be said that "the ground system under each mast provides a ground connection for that mast only," I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-08/msg00168.html (8,341 bytes)

9. Re: LF: RE: CFA (score: 1)
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 21:54:35 EST
<< The way I perceive the situation, some people are becoming upset because a new approach (unfortunately labeled "revolutionary") does not match the theories we have all learned. >> I have a somewha
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00060.html (11,279 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Re: visual-CW (score: 1)
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 17:08:26 EST
<< I am a little confused about the tests you describe Rik. If you eliminate the time gaps between a string of dots then you just get a long dash so I assume you are shifting frequency after each "el
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00102.html (8,556 bytes)

11. Re: LF: new visual-CW techniques (score: 1)
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 17:18:47 EST
Oops. Just after I posted my previous note on this subject, a new batch of mail arrived from the reflector with Rik's additional notes. Will be requesting the JPEG as Rik mentioned; rather eager to s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00103.html (8,085 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Earth or counterpoise 2 (score: 1)
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 11:33:42 EST
Just a couple of thoughts from an old broadcaster's perspective, if I may. The use of radials with an MF or LF vertical antenna has, for several decades, been more for the purpose of enhancing an ear
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00130.html (13,097 bytes)

13. Re: LF: Re LF General (score: 1)
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 13:14:32 EST
<< First of all I would like to take my hat off to The Two Daves and a Graham ... >> Does this mean we will get to watch their series in a year or two on BBC America? Sounds like a good programme tit
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00187.html (7,695 bytes)

14. Re: LF: RE -QRSS MSGS (score: 1)
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 12:47:02 EST
All messages appearing recently regarding QRSS are stating the obvious as regards the technicalities. ie signal over noise in a very narrow bandwidth. No one mentioned the big disadvantage of the ti
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00108.html (11,101 bytes)

15. Re: LF: RE -QRSS MSGS (score: 1)
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 20:55:57 EST
<< If you are limited to 1 watt dc input it would be interested to know what your expectations are of crossing the Atlantic to the UK on qrss. I rate your chances as NIL >> Until we have a full-fledg
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00112.html (10,568 bytes)

16. Re: LF: Below 9 kHz (score: 1)
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 11:17:24 EST
Magne raises a good point. One needs to consult the regulations in one's home country. Over here, frequencies below 9 kHz are not regulated, but the ITU requirement is interpreted to mean harmonic en
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00135.html (8,193 bytes)

17. Re: LF: LF antenna (score: 1)
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2000 10:36:46 EST
<< Basicaly a 'top inductance' reduces the voltage on the vertical part of the antenna. Assuming that the losses induced in surrounding objects (ground, houses, trees, etc...) affect mainly the elect
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00015.html (8,757 bytes)

18. Re: LF: Transatlantic (score: 1)
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 23:22:01 EST
Dave Brown writes: That said, the use of larger verticals will not necessarily give the best takeoff angle for the relatively poor skywave that they tend to produce. Bigger ain't necessarily better i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00183.html (11,688 bytes)

19. Re: LF: Transatlantic (score: 1)
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 01:51:22 EST
Thanks, Dave. I think we agree on all but a few points, which may have to do with perspective. After commenting on that, I have an announcement that may hearten those preparing to undertake this bold
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00215.html (20,452 bytes)

20. Re: LF: DCF39 heard in the US (score: 1)
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 17:26:04 EST
Hello Geri, It would be most interesting to hear your .wav recording of the DCF39 signal. In fact, if you'd be willing to send both files, I'd be glad to post them on the LWCA Web site for everyone w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00293.html (7,831 bytes)

This search system is powered by Namazu