Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 1130 ]

Total 1130 documents matching your query.

381. Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 19:34:24 +0000
4uHz, a good result for equipment and propagation. We are struggling with the QRN. A crazy time of year to be doing this. Most days are quiet only between 04:00 and 12:00, just a few days recently of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-06/msg00032.html (11,044 bytes)

382. Re: ULF: Key down signal on the 101 km band, still on the air (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 14:03:38 +0000
I've been trying with this transmission, and your earlier tests too. Bandwidths down to 6.6 uHz. I've been trying combinations of days and nights and both. So far, not the faintest hint of signal. I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-06/msg00114.html (9,629 bytes)

383. Re: ULF: Key down signal on the 101 km band, still on the air (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 06:48:47 +0000
Nothing is visible, not even the beginning of a peak at 2970, down to bandwidths of 1.36 uHz. I continue to experiment with the settings of filters and sferic blanker. The noise floor is too high, av
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-07/msg00036.html (11,447 bytes)

384. Re: VLF: 8270.0025 tonight (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 04:56:59 +0000
Huge signal, over 20dB stronger than normal here in Todmorden http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/160719a.gif -- Paul Nicholson --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-07/msg00086.html (9,166 bytes)

385. Re: ULF: Key down signal on the 101 km band, still on the air (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 04:59:11 +0000
So far nothing, not even in 0.6 uHz. But the noise level is much higher than it could be. Have to work on the filter and blanker settings. Will take some time but I suspect a detection is possible. I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-07/msg00087.html (11,453 bytes)

386. Re: ULF: Key down signal on the 101 km band, still on the air (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:33:41 +0000
Not yet. After some software alterations I've tried down to 1uHz bandwidth (about 10 days integration) but not the slightest trace. Noise floor down there is around 0.003 fT. Sferic blanker is worki
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-08/msg00138.html (10,845 bytes)

387. Re: LF: Re: Low QRN on VLF! (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 17:28:32 +0000
Your usual good signal here. Also today, looks like someone on 8270.000 this morning for a few hours. http://abelian.org/vlf/fbins.shtml#p=1475420400&b=080&s=sp -- Paul Nicholson --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-10/msg00027.html (10,353 bytes)

388. Re: LF: Re: Low QRN on VLF! (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 08:40:31 +0000
I wondered if that 8270 Hz might be Uwe, the bearing was right but the signal much weaker than normal. Also some other traces of signal at 8270: 2016-09-18_16:50,+1h and maybe 2016-09-13_11:10,+30m,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-10/msg00045.html (12,122 bytes)

389. Re: AW: Re: LF: 8279Hz - or 8270 ? (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 05:43:50 +0000
No decode of the message. I could not even see any carrier 16:02 to 17:00. -- Paul Nicholson --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-10/msg00061.html (10,745 bytes)

390. Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 12:05:26 +0000
No decode yet but will keep trying. It is often worth trying a range of beam headings, filter, and blanker settings. -- Paul Nicholson --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-10/msg00071.html (11,814 bytes)

391. Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 17:05:57 +0000
It looks like this will not decode. I was expecting an easy decode - last time (20th May) we had +2.7 dB from 100 second symbols, so 140 seconds should have been easy. Oh well, perhaps more luck with
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-10/msg00079.html (12,466 bytes)

392. Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 18:24:16 +0000
Progress: so far, a partial decode 'DK7FC4R,3ZSB35X' at Eb/N0 = -0.4 dB with a phase pattern of 120 90 90 60. I am branching out from there with some small frequency shifts and beam shifts. Just nee
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-10/msg00097.html (12,415 bytes)

393. Re: LF: More EbNaut tests on 137490 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 08:21:00 +0000
Overnight, the decoder turned up 'DK7FC4273 U8Z ' at Eb/N0 = -1.1 dB with 40.1% BER. It is still running. This is a great challenge, the signal is about 18 dB in 6uHz, which is about -68dB in audio b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-10/msg00104.html (12,120 bytes)

394. Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 09:40:02 +0000
Using the carrier on 6470.0025, I can see that the signal is completely lost in the noise during the night. Daytime S/N 06:00 to 18:00 UT is 21dB in 23uHz, which is sufficient for, say, 15 chars with
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-10/msg00137.html (12,705 bytes)

395. Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 19:35:22 +0000
No decode, just a false hit ' WV' at Eb/N0 = -0.7. Strange. According to carrier measurements this should be an easy decode at around +3db. More carrier measurements: night signal phase lags daytime
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-10/msg00161.html (13,028 bytes)

396. Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 14:21:15 +0000
Well, so far no decode (as you guess). Strange, the signal should be strong enough. Although only two electrons the reception is good, no sign of interference problems. Now I am experimenting with yo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-10/msg00183.html (13,281 bytes)

397. Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:10:52 +0000
Recent transmissions from Stefan 2016-10-05_21:00:02,+138880 6470.0 S140 C15 8K19A 2016-10-07_21:00:02,+166400 6470.0 S80 C15 16K25A 2016-10-10_14,+29h 6470.0025 carrier 2016-10-12_14:30:00,+16640 64
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-10/msg00371.html (14,638 bytes)

398. Re: LF: Re[2]: LF: Idiot's guide to receiving Ebnaut? - Tutorial part2 (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:31:02 +0000
I have used the Trimble Thunderbolt with its fixed 10uS pulse. It worked (vlfrx-tools, M-Audio 192) but timing jitter improved after a pulse stretcher increased the width to 1mS. As Andy says, the 10
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-10/msg00372.html (13,274 bytes)

399. Re: LF: Idiot's guide to receiving Ebnaut? - Tutorial part2 (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 15:18:23 +0000
Ran a quick trial here. With the Trimble 10uS directly into an E-MU 0202 at 192k/sec I get 100nS std dev of the raw intervals. The timing system here uses smoothed intervals which reduces the jitter
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-10/msg00409.html (14,070 bytes)

400. Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 18:23:39 +0000
Copied 'YES' at Eb/N0 = +5.7dB, BER = 35.6% Constant reference phase. Carrier S/N: 16.96 dB in 26.9 uHz. About -63dB in 2.5kHz bandwidth after sferic blanking. I was expecting around +6.5dB based on
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00002.html (12,189 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu