Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 458 ]

Total 458 documents matching your query.

281. LF: News item on ARRL web site (score: 1)
Author: "Vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 20:43:45 +1200
Hi all. ARRL have made a news item of the ZM2E and UA0LE LF QSO. It can be found at http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/03/30/1/ 73, Bob ZL2CA
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-03/msg00243.html (10,755 bytes)

282. LF: DCF39 in Wellington (score: 1)
Author: "Vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 08:57:40 +1200
Hi all, I checked overnight with 60 second dot length, and did get a signal on 138.83 kHz, but it seems not as good as Mike ZL4OL reports (he is about 550 km SW of me). Signals were first detected at
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-04/msg00047.html (9,669 bytes)

283. LF: Pic of capture (score: 1)
Author: "Vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 17:39:18 +1200
Hi all, See below a pic of what I captured on 138.83 kHz with 60 second dot length last night. I'll try with 10 second dot length tonight. 73, Bob ZL2CA JPEG image
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-04/msg00052.html (9,554 bytes)

284. LF: Re: DCF39 (score: 1)
Author: "Vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 09:15:36 +1200
Hi all, A signal on 138.83 kHz got stronger approaching ZL sunrise. A weak trace started from about 1715 UTC. See the 1854 UTC capture (which includes scales and time) for 10 second dot length. It lo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-04/msg00054.html (9,836 bytes)

285. LF: Re: RN beacon (score: 1)
Author: "Vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 17:38:30 +1200
Sam, OK, I'll listen out tonight. 73, Bob Sam, sorry but I am out of town today. I hope to listen tomorrow or Tuesday. Good luck. Mike ZL4OL
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-04/msg00058.html (9,996 bytes)

286. LF: O copy of RN6BN (score: 1)
Author: "Vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 08:30:07 +1200
Sam RN6BN, I am pleased to report that I got O copy of all of your call sign, in the period before ZL sunrise. Argo captures have RN abd the start of the 6 in the first graphic, and I'll send as a se
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-04/msg00065.html (9,653 bytes)

287. LF: Second capture of RB6BN (score: 1)
Author: "Vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 08:31:15 +1200
Sam RN6BN, See the second capture. 73, Bob ZL2CA JPEG image
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-04/msg00066.html (9,478 bytes)

288. LF: Typo in call sign of RN6BN (score: 1)
Author: "Vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 08:43:14 +1200
Sam RN6BN, My apology for the error in the subject line of earlier email, the RB6BN should of course be RN6BN. 73, Bob
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-04/msg00068.html (9,399 bytes)

289. Re: LF: O copy of RN6BN (score: 1)
Author: "Vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 09:02:17 +1200
Sam, OK on all comments. From Rik's message, a distance of 16464 km is further than VE1ZJ receiving the ZL6QH beacon (15645 km). 73, Bob Hello Bob! Very very TNX for nice report. Always ready experie
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-04/msg00072.html (11,643 bytes)

290. LF: Frequency for RN6BN beacon (score: 1)
Author: "Vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 09:36:22 +1200
Sam, My frequency calibration (TS-850 with very good VCTCXO) is for Argo 803 Hz corresponding to 137.703 kHz, and should be better than 0.1 Hz. 73, Bob
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-04/msg00075.html (8,816 bytes)

291. Re: LF: Frequency for RN6BN beacon (score: 1)
Author: "Vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 19:20:37 +1200
Sam, OK. I'll continue to look for your beacon. Also I expect Andrew ZL2BBJ and Mike ZL4OL to be trying. Will it be QRSS60 each night? 73, Bob Yes, Bob, my TRX Yaesu FT-990 is not calibrated. +- ? Hz
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-04/msg00081.html (9,944 bytes)

292. LF: Re: Re: O copy of RN6BN (score: 1)
Author: "Vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 19:50:48 +1200
Ed RU6LA, My home station receiving setup is an active antenna feeding a TS-850 and Argo looking at the audio. The active antenna is a 10 metre insulated pipe guyed in a tree in the rear corner of my
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-04/msg00083.html (14,441 bytes)

293. LF: a trace of RN6BN (score: 1)
Author: "Vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 08:03:41 +1200
Sam RN6BN, Last night was not so productive, only a trace received in a capture at 1636 UTC. Nil in all other captures. Commenting on QRSS vs DFCW, for beaconing the main benefit of DFCW is that it h
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-04/msg00092.html (11,116 bytes)

294. Re: LF: a trace of RN6BN (score: 1)
Author: "Vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 08:31:45 +1200
Brian CT1DRP, Bob, my system is fired up to transmit, what frequency is available, I don't want to double? I am clear of QRM around 137.700 kHz, so I suggest you go just higher in frequency. 73, Bob
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-04/msg00095.html (10,736 bytes)

295. Re: LF: a trace of RN6BN (score: 1)
Author: "Vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 09:10:18 +1200
Brian, I'll be listening out over 0600 UTC (9 hours away). 73, Bob Bob, I have just powered up the transmitter on 137703, DFCW 120s +/- 0.1, transmitting my callsign. I think we have a very short com
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-04/msg00097.html (11,283 bytes)

296. Re: LF: a trace of RN6BN (score: 1)
Author: "Vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 19:18:28 +1200
Brian CT1DRP, A nil report for 177.703 kHz around 0600z. 73, Bob ZL2CA
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-04/msg00103.html (10,106 bytes)

297. LF: M copy of RN6BN (score: 1)
Author: "Vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 08:20:14 +1200
Sam RN6BN, This morning I got some copy, but not a full call sign. The attached pic was captured at 1719 UTC. The following capture had fades. No other signal seen around 137.703 kHz. 73, Bob ZL2CA
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-04/msg00112.html (8,401 bytes)

298. LF: M copy of RN6BN (score: 1)
Author: "Vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 13:06:41 +1200
Sam RN6BN, I'm not sure what happened to my earlier messages, but in summary your DFCW120 beacon last night had M copy with each of ZL2CA and ZL2BBJ. 73, Bob ZL2CA
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-04/msg00120.html (8,433 bytes)

299. LF: RN6BN beacon tests (score: 1)
Author: "Vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:42:47 +1200
Sam, Yes, continue with DFCW120. Also Brian, or anyone else, could nestle into the 137.703 kHz zone, within a Hz or so, but with none being co-incident in frequency, and if any ZL receiver gets a mes
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-04/msg00122.html (9,447 bytes)

300. LF: Nil report for CT1DRP (score: 1)
Author: "Vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 18:58:21 +1200
Brian CT1DRP, Nil found on 137.703 kHz this evening. 73, Bob ZL2CA
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-04/msg00123.html (9,035 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu