Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 536 ]

Total 536 documents matching your query.

221. Re: LF: W1VD amp help - finally some progress! (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 20:14:21 -0400
Jay, At least now I've seen some real evidence the gate drive overlap issue and ringing are related, if not cause and effect. Agreed mine is slow to turn on as well as off, though arguably being slow
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-04/msg00221.html (20,619 bytes)

222. Re: LF: Antenna change over relay testing question (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:19:02 -0400
Hello Chris, The only "something" I can think of would be a really small fast blow fuse. Fuses come in ratings down to 1mA at least but they tend to be pricey and a bit hard to find. I can't be sure
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-04/msg00254.html (16,398 bytes)

223. LF: W1VD amp help - MY FINAL POST (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 13:23:14 -0400
For sake of completeness, as there were some following this hoping to learn from my experience... After a break I went back to work on the amp. I swapped out the IR2110. No significant change. I swap
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-04/msg00292.html (13,077 bytes)

224. Re: LF: How can you tell if a Class D amp output transformer is starting to saturate? (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 11:36:49 -0400
I am still not sure whether I am using that equation correctly. Chris, if you will forgive me for tagging along on your post, I'm trying to get this equation sorted in my head. Put no faith in anythi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-05/msg00028.html (14,637 bytes)

225. Re: LF: How can you tell if a Class D amp output transformer is starting to saturate? (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 07:29:14 -0400
Thanks Andy. I've added a page on this in my handwritten notebook. I do have some related questions which go beyond what Chris asked about. What about stacked cores? If we stack three cores, each hav
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-05/msg00034.html (19,207 bytes)

226. Re: LF: How can you tell if a Class D amp output transformer is starting to saturate? (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 08:36:28 -0400
I realize iron powder cores aren't or shouldn't be used for transformers at LF. However they are popular for inductors in filters, Class E amplifiers etc. I was recently working with a Class E design
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-05/msg00038.html (20,491 bytes)

227. LF: EbNaut LF link (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 07:20:29 -0400
Some time ago a link was posted to a web page discussing equipment for use of EbNaut at LF (137 kHz). I was sure I saved it, but I can't find it now. Could someone post the link again, please? *Any*
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-05/msg00046.html (10,768 bytes)

228. LF: Re: Can a TX and RX antenna share a common ground system? (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 11:52:54 -0400
Hi Chris, A common ground between TX antennas should be fine. The long wire is probably OK on there too, but there are so many permutations and possibilities I will add that in *some* cases it *might
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-05/msg00058.html (12,265 bytes)

229. Re: LF: Is it expected for antenna phase to change with varying power levels? (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 11:34:51 -0400
Chris, Mine doesn't change at all from 200 milliwatts (which I use when tuning the antenna from an unknown condition) to 200 watts. We're still waiting to see what happens at higher power but getting
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-05/msg00083.html (13,610 bytes)

230. Re: LF: RV: TA spots again (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 08:45:37 -0400
Hi Luis, This is good to see. I moved my RX antenna and these are the first X-Atlantic decodes at the new location. Thanks for TXing ! 73, Paul N1BUG On 05/18/2018 08:09 AM, VIGILANT Luis Fernández w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-05/msg00099.html (26,839 bytes)

231. Re: LF: Rx wspr 136khz tonight (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2018 06:49:07 -0400
I have successfully decoded DCF49, HGA22 and DCF39 using MultiPSK. I read somewhere the stations occasionally transmit an ID among the packets, but I never did see one. 73, Paul N1BUG
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-05/msg00154.html (15,802 bytes)

232. Re: LF: No spots from Reunion last night but TA from N1BUG (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2018 07:40:46 -0400
Thanks Luis. In the past week I received EI0CF, F5WK, EA5DOM on MF WSPR. I could probably do better if I had a directional RX antenna. The vertical is very noisy with storms to my south and west almo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-06/msg00039.html (15,206 bytes)

233. Re: LF: Transmitting on MF (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2018 07:45:17 -0400
Hi Oscar ! I will look for you tonight. My web host has made some change which breaks the FTP upload, so my online grabber is not working. But I will have local copies of screen capture and will chec
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-06/msg00040.html (13,694 bytes)

234. Re: LF: Transmitting on MF (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2018 06:39:30 -0400
HI Oscar, LF, I did not get enough to make any identification but I did see some QRSS30 elements on 475.000 just after my sunset. 73, Paul N1BUG On 06/09/2018 02:12 AM, Oscar Villafañe wrote: HI TO A
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-06/msg00056.html (14,198 bytes)

235. LF: Transmitting LF WSPR (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 19:40:19 -0400
After a lengthy absence I have resumed transmitting on 2200m WSPR2 as of this afternoon. I intend to run through tonight testing a new amplifier. EIRP is about the same as before, 0.5 watt. 73, Paul
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-06/msg00093.html (11,030 bytes)

236. LF: Thanks for the WSPR reports (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 15:40:38 -0400
Thanks to all who monitored 137 kHz WSPR during the past two nights despite summer static. The W1VD kilowatt deck has performed flawlessly at the quarter kW level. Next tests I hope will be in some w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-06/msg00108.html (11,191 bytes)

237. Re: LF: RE: Simple transverter for 472kHz (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 18:09:02 -0400
My only comment is that the ones I have heard seem to consistently drift 1 to 2 Hz during a 2 minute WSPR transmission. So if you wanted to use one for something like slow DFCW on LF, you would proba
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-07/msg00044.html (16,069 bytes)

238. Re: LF: RE: Simple transverter for 472kHz (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 19:50:56 -0400
Of course it could be the transceiver drifting, but curiously all I have been aware of so far moved in the same direction and approximately the same amount... who knows. Paul
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-07/msg00045.html (16,884 bytes)

239. LF: Receiver protection (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 08:04:25 -0400
Does anyone have ideas for receiver front end protection at LF and MF? I am worried about my TX signal damaging receivers. Of course the best idea is to disconnect the RX antenna from the receiver wh
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-07/msg00054.html (12,122 bytes)

240. Re: LF: Receiver protection (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 09:05:34 -0400
Hi Stefan, I am thinking they only limit peak voltage to 0.6V? If that's right, then I think this is about +5 dBm, perhaps still enough to damage a receiver. I was trying to avoid switching because w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-07/msg00056.html (13,884 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu