Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Antenna change over relay testing question

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Antenna change over relay testing question
From: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:19:02 -0400
Autocrypt: addr=[email protected]; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsFNBFqj1+0BEACggWlaH8oG/AiXSUG3CeQwZ1NrVEP4U7YsA9N9XEffjCDEsnTjHF2BJSgS 2AicyomkmTGvghEHxrNFfFw07jwgJl97ae/VtNxpERPSE98mb4sPOMpJbwddioMazMDXwhKA wpg5fse+Ru8OrIT04KK919xL/pZuAP6pY6d2kVoizjJOfS71pHpiU6N6q3d9cl+w7d2LKhAE a3A1ZgDquPvn0WQlrN8K5D66xVrwTRhf1b5H4Ozl8/mMJzCeLG1ZIsDB3Pu2flwE81P8dCJA y1azwgY8pTEshVk4em/se9uRiZaDJr/qUSCf6hrV7AGa8g1jpAQDmdGpDNYMqyDqXen4jNi1 8kNFVu1BMl2vjaI8skw/YPxIxlk/0ROHYhN6SuoDq1mt4AW4FryNa7k3A8dM8Bt7udBoTv0i uw4j9R/bmh2vl/QaHRUhDco0xn2z6geWvXkKqha++vzXDrEKUuqgB85SDZPs5W/phs9p0pz1 xA61d1gn8FQJtpou5dQuAucqMo8eKQY5LUcbC+MH5pebH+M2wIuDCBmFPJHQDSPNepeaxJ4o G/HU1hrpzlgLiTTSKR8DcwtMQwYywnCTlm8MgL4jXuPzoGyKDMYyKIjC51G+3AAOJ6oXJAGR g0ehhCPtmnCGBaRlUIoUSpbgc4B+onqFKZmDiVm9CRNJhKIWrQARAQABzRZOMUJVRyA8cGF1 bEBuMWJ1Zy5jb20+wsF9BBMBCAAnBQJao9ftAhsjBQkJZgGABQsJCAcCBhUICQoLAgQWAgMB Ah4BAheAAAoJECRS/J8srRGjPBsQAIh+Haz9gqrQJ0OlMI5xmQ0A5nsVWcatWF/Ea4mucNjL 4n4jmW+Z4Ukn3OVss55chWwrOVMRNWU2d2zRc92ZF7yJhLCoJFV870bZfxNYwdJ3GEBLIu6/ anmQYX0oXFx8UBsx5K6egNqbeflPA7zrLiQkWrz6JApECdiA1rHDjyJdS7PDxBCG9cKgr/5b r4Rn/JlUl9pRPnxlSwHXsV+J6JtFYtWI69MWIVD7Y7OY1wO9+684uOnzeDANzeIwpBDcSm6p 0D5u0b1hfPl2TD0ozVs6P0NvxkMbimXUhRR1QD0FvydyxmZTLAo+XZDGR8GqWYrYrauoRZ1h 3m23+bNT2T4AuoFnWekpsZu+sxIf0LKPtEZCa51O65jZ810ROpXg9Lx71gEoQD+kbjO69+kq 9r7wjytDq/jyhpOGrGYV6kgcQrISY86t9YvkA9Of2HDzZLih3GwecW6fkeV1AO5w4RteE9nL zIs2siGw2YqavF6LpTH71Db7cUYyZWn5hkKpwfpLNnPEuqgZACovpH1WUHx+KMqqIL4rMVCH GcSLqnH2KF4cEDb6OeTbwuLfpGlN+I3j24eQnB2uz5rDa7/IBjsClLl8S/wdDTP8IikBGixX 06v3k06tk/OF4UsfJ0cY/ASGP5+kjT4ASMZAIikwVMpKi5A5be77vecKNYlJQ2a6zsFNBFqj 1+0BEACaujZXo3F17v7QTnub4DjjYvm+nr8J0uU5pPc1UMEz9eWjmtmITm15fx1hPKNtVW+I VlT+DG+ShNnYmO2M4CFBoc7PwkAOc70aDxfHz20kotvj1HhXG7oBiqPkN3TK4C7qWV1HUEPA V960qPdhsoCqmtkvNwj39w1T0ZR5qwwaqDogs9UwBib7zseQ3OXHG32xYYCMcxM35hgXGkkz R7wFL4ZnAPOeFb8LnWtZcrGpwXdsYkXuCxm+A+u9KlFY+w3ZCzZt1F9Ie+/PSZnFIUtbXt2i mfc+VkRwOLz5BDAeWuDL09TN81+gbrR3kXlymDcCbuduO/yHOQK085qzE3LuImdy+JNb7oDf 1C/hvpRvtB02vVy33rzIXT8644SJzFY/mw/W39/BgHKCoL1FrBbfgf0UoIFw5M752i7jQwmv j5yFfnVAXIPpCuusMwWMGVpZcGV7QxJxh0HBEhYgOo9v3zKwzNIPm9V/LA67u/rj4a/MlCE0 mpd6IHaePE1vXDaboPZHZdhAziru5/Jd7KQI0k+HmM/HRANPRNDZ4UeBpgj9PzS6hDN5GHlZ fRUbI8JAg9wSaQtEn0bjyaR7lw0yngZTvvjT1Qqt5zGwm1IAall2STes5xK0aS7p+UJJMVbf ydZ5VOnocvUkwYxbiqoyuVtGxi4tpWW9CRstYXMkAwARAQABwsFlBBgBCAAPBQJao9ftAhsM BQkJZgGAAAoJECRS/J8srRGjTDMP/18q7uhac/naxoFsOqhgXIlvaPgu6GX7s/QOh+bcSV1F y50lxo51P/C95H2TVME/CtCjk2xWQcNjWtXloMEsZpl7T3qWgJHvyZYkDtgh3M6UNY+zb08U K9E2+rR0AZ6zdMKio7Z1xA9BtbUpSZpvy2NgjoYVqo35NllUWMZJq0u+88PvE5WeCIqLipNI EZmUcG9UwolQbPkrRc42ReL+bFbuXGXDA5GbQ0RudXbugI8iUwaw3ftaKElIZtuHW0hw1VrU 9tVHsxKyEoKgNNT1hr+dgRmvCHmA87Pi4R5cMV0ZkLVOYfPX1motedag7HmSNPi2PkYLts4z kyvPEJe2IvaPvjvK1ShRWWgje3uytrhfwyjUZcIuA76RWEfBbwT2Mbrn9O7LvrYtbTiTlsLo Zdk2uocuefBvPd2oI7mTn5eLy/VDy2JVnlb9vpZZhriXI4KtCcP6mYyuPxlxqj/30Kn1fU5b C4EpnKy6hW1CHM42DbwzT+ChjBpFbX9bfwT4qn6d42+T4mN5wkmfnBRHfcn8Wf1ezRSK3Ome Esa3ZDssj23CZHe11uec6Ln14qoB7JyRT9qM3Q99tzvAlmWFM3GrSsG94g4JponQjQWHmr8B eMYezwJHzSI7zWElJpzs/OuohstTYfYTy16FygUOEinc1K4ywjEklgRpXRtjKvqc
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
Hello Chris,

The only "something" I can think of would be a really small fast
blow fuse. Fuses come in ratings down to 1mA at least but they tend
to be pricey and a bit hard to find. I can't be sure that would blow
fast enough to catch all potential momentary glitches which might
harm a delicate receiver. Surely someone here has a better idea!

Reversing the amp and antenna connections should not cause the
problem in and of itself. Reversing those connections combined with
failure of the relay to switch would but in that case you probably
shouldn't have been receiving anything earlier in the night since
the antenna would never have been connected to the receiver.

I don't see how delayed relay switching would have caused your
problem (unless the connections were in fact reversed) but exactly
how is this configured? Does the U3S switch on the DC-DC converter
or does the DC-DC converter run all the time with the U3S simply
energizing the relay from it? I'm wondering about start-up time for
the converter...

Good luck with it. I personally don't like using the transmit
antenna for receiving as it slams way too high a level into the
receiver, leading to possible overload issues. I suppose you could
use an attenuator.

Even with a dedicated and small receiving antenna it's wise to
provide some sort of overload protection for the receiver. I
measured 250mW coming down the line from my LNV while transmitting
on LF with 200 watts! Not good! Here the protection is extremely
crude, a pair of back to back diodes across the receiver input. That
has protected my receiver but causes its own set of issues.
Unfortunately I don't have a better solution that works at LF.

Paul



On 04/16/2018 06:24 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello  LF'ers,
> 
> After  an  expensive  accident whereby my home brew antenna change over
> relay  put  nearly  a  kW  of  RF up the RX antenna jack of my Kenwood
> TS-590  i want to safely long term test the relay. It may have been my
> lack  of  foresight  in using two identical N type sockets for the amp
> input  and  the  antenna  on the relay box and they got reversed...The
> relay is a Russian
> http://qro-parts.com/product_info.php?products_id=102
> 
> It  needs 24V to reliably change, that is sourced from 12V via a DC to
> DC  converter  that  is  energised via a safely long delay from my U3S
> exciter so TX is delayed 100mS   It's connected like this:
> 
> 
>  The output of my 1 kW amplifier to NO connection and receiver to NC
>  connection of the same relay, with COM port to antenna), then
>  de-energized I'd always be in RX mode and energized I'd be in TX mode
>  and there's no way the TX should ever be connected to the RX no
>  matter what failed. (Theoretically! I am not sure what reversing the
>  amp and antenna connections may have caused, but I am concerned some
>  other issue caused the RF to appear on the RX port....) I don't think
>  the  pre  LPF voltages from the amp would be too high for this relay,
>  but  can't  be  1005  sure  of  this given what occurred. In any case
>  there's  also a 40 Amp 24V automotive "safety relay" that grounds the RX 
> output jack
>  when  in  TX  mode. The failure of this to protect the TS-590 further
>  suggests  I  might  have  had  the  antenna  and amplifier connectors
>  reversed,  although it all worked fine until the early hours when the
>  WSPR spots ceased and I found the bad news.
> 
> Anyway, I need a "something" to put across the RX antenna output BNC
> socket that wil blow or somehow tell tale if RF is injected there. I
> don't have a high power enough dummy load other than a huge water
> cooled 10kW Bird one which means flowing mains water through it to an
> outside gutter overnight or longer. My none water cooled one won't
> take high power for long at all. If a FET blows in the amp I can
> swallow that, rather than my current Red Pitaya receiver getting RF up
> it :) So what could I put across the jack instead of a receiver that
> will tell tale anything nasty happening during a prolonged test
> please? Thanks.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>