Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: CFH Halifax (score: 1)
Author: "M5FRA - Colin" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:41:57 +0000
There was a rumour around that the US military were reinstating their world wide HF network, guess it would be data and not CW. Colin - G8FRA/M5FRA www.m5fra.org.uk -- Original Message -- From: "mal
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00019.html (12,169 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Fwd: Fw: Re: 136,74kHz (score: 1)
Author: "M5FRA - Colin" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:41:08 +0000
Stefan, it was your beacon I heard today using a TS-590 on a random piece of wire, a steady 559 for hours. Colin - G8FRA/M5FRA www.m5fra.org.uk -- Original Message -- From: "Stefan Schäfer" <Stefan.S
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00447.html (12,459 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: Wonderful: A real QSO again! (score: 1)
Author: "M5FRA - Colin" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:39:13 +0000
I heard my first 136Khz station today, a German CW beacon. I had thought of getting on LF, and the new MF allocation when it comes, but if most of the activity is now on data/QRSS etc then perhaps no
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00474.html (12,060 bytes)

4. Re[2]: LF: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation (score: 1)
Author: "M5FRA - Colin" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:46:08 +0000
Ken, I would respectfully suggest that 17wpm is not slow! Colin - G8FRA/M5FRA www.m5fra.org.uk -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Sent: 27/02/20
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00504.html (19,716 bytes)

5. LF: FS TX and vario (score: 1)
Author: "M5FRA - Colin" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:20:01 +0000
I have for sale an GW3UEP QTX 100W and a variometer see http://www.m5fra.org.uk/2013/01/01/first-contact-on-472khz/ pa for sale, all works very well. Please contact me direct if you are interested. C
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00130.html (8,933 bytes)

6. Re[2]: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? (score: 1)
Author: "M5FRA - Colin" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:11:19 +0000
Chris, "obsessive DX CW only enthusiasts" on 630m? No of course not! You could easily argue that taking up a lot of bandwidth for a voice modes is excessive use of the limited space we have. Then the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00160.html (13,945 bytes)

7. Re[2]: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? (score: 1)
Author: "M5FRA - Colin" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 12:08:44 +0000
+++ OFFLIST +++ Pete, so the vocal minority always get their way? Seems that passes for democracy these days. As for your assertion that "there are no sanctions" do not believe it. There is an organi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00310.html (15,081 bytes)

8. Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? (score: 1)
Author: "M5FRA - Colin" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 08:24:43 +0000
Just a thought.....when it gets totally washed out with SSB all 24 hours how are you going to clean it out? People in general dont follow gentlemen's agreements they were not party too.....and "it do
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00321.html (10,759 bytes)

9. Re[5]: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? (score: 1)
Author: "M5FRA - Colin" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:54:56 +0000
Roger, thank you for your support. I must admit to being very disillusioned with the response I have received and do not like the abusive direct emails from anonymous senders. I decided today to give
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00336.html (15,952 bytes)

10. Re[3]: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? (score: 1)
Author: "M5FRA - Colin" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:07:20 +0000
I am sorry but I did not express myself very clearly in the last couple of posts and there were lots of typos. I will attempt to explain why I am opposed to digital voice/SSB on 630m. <?xml:namespace
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00628.html (13,326 bytes)

11. Re[5]: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? (score: 1)
Author: "M5FRA - Colin" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 12:19:31 +0000
Pete, I live within the law and hope I have respect for other people and users of the spectrum. Your attitude to band plans is a perfect example of what is wrong with the hobby. Colin - M5FRA m5fra.o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00737.html (17,034 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu