Dear LF Group, No reports received so far from last night's Jason tests - so will try again this evening at the same times - 400mW ERP from 1900 until 2000 utc, and 40mW ERP from 2000 until 2100 utc
To all the German operators my sincere thanks and very well done. There is an Argo-gram of DF6NM/P on my web pages. To Mal, providing the calibration of my system is not too far off the highest field
Very pleased to report that the signal is now being received on 136.5KHz both in Coruña and Porto, and in Porto it is "just" audible in the noise on the loudspeaker. Brian Just what I said some years
Hello Jim Sri to mislead you about loop direction. The loop is broadside N/S so max sig on LF is E/W. Back to the drawing board hi My vertical has a big advantage over the loop but not operational at
Today DCF39/138.83 KHZ measured -29 db on the spm12 at the same time as DL2NDO/P measured -50 db. It looks like DCF has a 21 db advantage. The loop is broadside N/S so on LF as a small loop it has ma
For those that like figures and data to speculate, invent or guess erp emitted by others on LF, I measured the signal today from DL2NDO/P and other associated callsigns used at various times. on 136.
I don't think it is a matter of impressing someone but just of taking a chance to experiment, How could you consider this as an experiment, the outcome is obvious, a big signal from a commercial ant
-- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Dick Rollema To: [email protected] LF-Group Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2002 10:12 AM Subject: LF: Luxemburg effect? To All from PA0SE Alre
Hello all LFers in the USA. Although I have had some information direct about progress in the USA on LF, I was wondering what general progress was going on, and was anyone getting ready for Transatla
I do not think it matters who was first, its hardly new technology on LF. Radio amateurs are only retracing the steps of those commercial operators that have gone before. A good solid creditable qso
The first xband QSO between EA/G3 took place on the 13 - Feb - 1999 at 2147 utc between EA1QX, Jose near Vigo and myself G3KEV. My report was 439 on 136.5 khz and his report from me on 3568 khz was 5
The information on G3YXM web page about a first EA/G qso is incorrect. I worked EA1PX around 2 years ago xband, solid signals each way. This was reported here when the qso took place. I have also wor
Hello All Can anyone hear fsk revs on 137.3khz with a shift of abt 6 hz. Quite loud here about 30 db above noise. Its not a problem but curious. 73 de Mal/G3KEV
Busy here most of the day but checking the odd time on 136 khz I did hear and see DF6NM and DL3FDO a few minutes ago on 137.68 khz. They did not seem to attract much attention. QRN moderate but solid
I recall someone making a very narrow CW filter (20Hz?) which utilised a number of 32kHz clock crystals. I'd like to have a go at building one but can't recall where I saw the information. Can anyon
I called Neil Carter today, he was the guy that had the W&G SLMs for sale at the Donington Park exhibition. I gather that a couple of other people from the list have been in touch with him (Mal?) fo
Hi, Group. INFO from Vlad. Because 135.5 is common CW FREQ today he will transmit on 137.71 kHz. As Ed get Vlad's sigs on 135.51 when nominal FREQ was 135.5 today Vlad will set nominal 137.7 wich co
I have looked at the NoV and other documentation received from the RA. It seems to be silent regarding any crossband working with amateurs in the normal amateur bands. On the other hand, paragraph (
