Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: 160 years of Popov birthday

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: 160 years of Popov birthday
From: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 22:48:01 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juno.com; s=alpha; t=1552877412; bh=47DEQpj8HBSa+/TImW+5JCeuQeRkm5NMpJWZG3hSuFU=; l=0; h=To:Date:Subject:Content-Type:From:Message-Id; b=hk5Ckn+HMrvKtChH/7k8miJ+mjgT0OxuH7mTpBZqM8lV2iVt2k8gsrUaZBbbgqQC4 GzJogyS7SrWewhBuaK0X7k6XoVoepMnuPQSK5sg3BI8x7UHnsm39Cj96V0ck+SNlPn ZRSbw4nLRdaPKjmT10+ycqMgJpr8YiLtTBr9ePpg=
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

wow I  have no idea,,, probably 15 yr ago,,, iron filings on one side and nickle on the other,,, dont remember what
I used of for the center
did operate using the spark from an old furnace ignition transformer
played with pressure on the filings , Quantity etc
used a fuze with the inside cleansed out,,,, was a long weekend
lots of goog;e info
 
 
Bob K3DJC
 
 
On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:04:58 +0000 (UTC) James Hollander <[email protected]> writes:
Hi Bob,  what was the RF current threshold on your coherer?  I'm wondering if a virtualized coherer using the coherer principle could lower the threshold and respond quicker compared to a state of the art hardware coherer. 
            Congratulations and thanks for your email!
73,  Jim H   W5EST 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: riese-k3djc <[email protected]>
To: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>
Sent: Sun, Mar 17, 2019 6:39 pm
Subject: Re: LF: 160 years of Popov birthday

why not build one,, i  did several years ago,, took a lot of RF to activate but it worked
 
Bob K3DJC
 
On Sun, 17 Mar 2019 22:02:36 +0000 (UTC) James Hollander <[email protected]> writes:
Hi Roman,  
 
Yes, I wonder how to do it in software.  As you know, a coherer has a large number of particles that statistically become more closely packed and connective in response to RF voltage or current applied to them.  
 
Since software defined radios have replaced many functions in short wave receivers with software on a computer, why not envisage some software virtualization of the coherer.  We've been trained to think a coherer is a quaint relic of the first days of radio.   But what truly are the performance limits of the coherer in principle and what improvements starting from the coherer concept might actualize advances or technological alternatives in radio?   Perhaps ultimately the answer is "None",  but has  the question even been probed.
 
I recognize most of us may not be in a position to inquire into the matter, but I want to put the topic forward.   If there's any group that includes someone with the background and interests to potentially think through this software challenge, they're probably in this LF/VLF/ULF/SLF/ELF group now or in the future!
 
TU & 73, Jim H    W5EST 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Roman <[email protected]>
To: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>
Sent: Sun, Mar 17, 2019 7:34 am
Subject: Re: LF: 160 years of Popov birthday

Hi Jim!

PSE more info about your software, OM!
VY interesting.


> FB, Roman. BTW, I've wondered how one could write radio detection software to act like a coherer and improve upon its principle. The software would be a "swarm detector" working on the collective interaction of many elemental pieces or software elements. 73, Jim H W5EST
--
73!

Roman, RW3ADB


 
 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>