Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Lowfer] LF: Re: FET change, hmmm

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Lowfer] LF: Re: FET change, hmmm
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2018 17:38:58 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1543768739; bh=EMJxYgKH90JzUzpYfZ5XchadK9FnQvIKdDcsx65vC10=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=RNYBcUZq6soWrD9LBaQCGQ+JCc1RMmsJDcTNLv2KRdV5cqBPc62c6PxsZ52naH6nv CoqSiAcjjNtS8273jBEsiN6Vu/V4Fx/kfLQ3ZulRa5D7i8FbEPF6zdBWUZIUVQx/f9 +35yACZ7zw1jJ7ryjOB9XH3035n9LtLnJzIkZYaNsBajUvNmiliTjI0vJjpjY1V4Ky SsB4w+11bpDwabcm24fk++yVSRTk9RqC95NIaIP0A71qzjFOaYa7vaEBONJA78NiUt pwMPqJ6kzA4580Lon4fdZOcGA3oSVL0czkI010S/pvhaEjbYrBH3Yb3huGiXgnukUA 30SSSFVlMgctQ==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23SLRjnpDk-=4V_26kWObL=tC9RXNwVp__cxCUd+hcYwmg@mail.gmail.com> <trinity-cc8c170d-cca4-471f-9cfa-4b08ae2e53f0-1543608209738@3c-app-webde-bap21> <CAA8k23Q20B6z9VV_XQxAk8yQw6LAd44XNwhbXUhHrWXJmenJkw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hi Paul,

In one of my early PA designa i also used an IR2110 to drive FETs having 4 nF gate capacity. At 137 kHz the driver became quite hot and the total life time was just about 20 hours. In my opinion this driver is not a good choice for 137 kHz when using large FETs. The ringing should be reduced by first reducing stay inductances and then maybe adding 1 to 5 Ohm in series to the gate. I spread the winding of the gates in my H bridge equally over the core and then twisted the two wires. Also i soldered them as close as possible to the FET, to reduce galvanic coupling.
73, GL, Stefan


Am 30.11.2018 21:50, schrieb N1BUG:
All I know is this amp had very little drain ringing and worked well
with FQA34N20 FETs but it is not happy with FQA32N20.

I slowly increased drain voltage but at 200W out (of a kilowatt
deck), there were obvious issues related to the ringing.

I've gone back to my old faithful 200W output Class E amp for now. I
am running WSPR-2 33% 137.437.

Paul


On 11/30/18 3:25 PM, Andy Talbot wrote:
Cross conduction spikes can also be dealt with by inserting a bit of
inductance between top and bottom FETs of a totem pole, or in each leg of a
push-pull pair.  As done in the old Decca transmitters, and I cribbed for
my   700 Watt 137 design.
The inductor absorbs the short spike and returns the energy via clamp
diodes to the supply
See http://www.g4jnt.com/137tx.pdf

A lot simpler than worrying about generating a special drive waveform with
gaps

Andy
www.g4jnt.com



On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 20:19, Hans-Albrecht Haffa<[email protected]>  wrote:

Dear OMs, dear Paul,

To prevend current spikes by cross conduction of both fets it is necesary
to use a gate drive circuit with dead time, as used in power supplies. But
in this case there is a no current flow time in both transistors, what may
cause spikes in the drain circuit. Damping of oscillations in the drain
circuit may also reached by quiescent current, not used for class D PAs. To
load the spikes to the load is not possible in an LW-PA, like in an
flyback-transformer of an switch mode power supply, as the load is an
LP-Filter that filters by reflections of the applied voltage.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>