To: | N1BUG <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 |
From: | Chris Wilson <dead.fets@gmail.com> |
Date: | Sat, 17 Nov 2018 13:07:30 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=33tn8bXHSXBDZUIxXmXt2UMR0ZFLE7bry/AglUGy7ok=; b=l0IwiwP6Y1lMCw7AwHsMVZz5Wzp96ZOwkSIeoXhY4ujM+lfZanwqfXtQr0O8XU8DjH amMRuVBOTrfsowCQ7xLL32HnW5F3VHo+5e68hMM2LP/G4ItL3fyNRGxajz0sTVrcrdD2 gKRpcnaYEo9f/gNv6jSj89X+sBHe+H66M8yh/9qJ7ONm9V8S48QSOz0u+FA7hkfZTkqE Wv+XmEVkQ7vvKXs3FpsufG8n4W2H6QW1964xOI2IPjXcsyNzm1WHqxn24BoT40xTgNjm mkEC0eF4zZ7M7me7GkfBiDb+VjcHtpMHW1Q8eHXg+WYjZ5YI/x77qnO8ljWxkUi0JL6Y ntvQ== |
In-reply-to: | <e4a42e64-3631-8a2e-284b-8b3e0e439c63@n1bug.com> |
References: | <818091004.1158892.1542301019212.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <818091004.1158892.1542301019212@mail.yahoo.com> <CAC+C6w4jqcY4d-ynfvsEOMngGq5KPG6=vJ5O=6NqUEbAYz-UgA@mail.gmail.com> <5BEFF833.8080100@posteo.de> <e4a42e64-3631-8a2e-284b-8b3e0e439c63@n1bug.com> |
Reply-to: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
Sender: | owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
Hello N1BUG, Saturday, November 17, 2018, 12:01:59 PM, you wrote: > On 11/17/18 6:14 AM, DK7FC wrote: >> Who of them uses the latest wsprd.exe and the latest dlls together with >> the old GUI, as suggested by Domenico? > Not me. I was using the fully original WSPR-X along with the decoder > which came with it. The old WSPR-X GUI is so unstable there seems no > point in trying to upgrade its decoder. > How many who run WSPR-X successfully are on old versions of Windows > which were around at the time this GUI was written and compiled? Is > it always stable on old Windows versions? > How many are running it on Windows versions which were released > since WSPR-X? Do you experience problems? > WSPR-X is no longer available for download, but I believe the source > code may still be found with some digging. If it is stable on old > versions of Windows, is there any possibility the source could be > recompiled with a modern compiler which understands Windows 8 and > 10? Or would the source code need to be modified? > 73, > Paul BTW, here is the WSPR15 enabled version I am using in case anyone has trouble finding a copy these days: http://www.chriswilson.tv/WSPRX_08r3058.exe -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15, DK7FC |
---|---|
Next by Date: | R: Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15, marcocadeddu@tin.it |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15, DK7FC |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15, Chris Wilson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |