Re: LF: LF JT-9 ?

[N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>]

Hi Stefan, LF,

Too for for me on JT9 but I will be happy to do a DFCW QSO later. :-)

I have a bit of work to do but soon I will be ready for CW, JT9,
DFCW (and as a last resort QRSS) again. I do have some small
challenges with DFCW/QRSS. I must use the U3S as the exciter, so it
takes a bit of time to change the message.

73,
Paul N1BUG



On 11/8/18 3:22 AM, DK7FC wrote:
> LF,
> 
> Fortunately there are several new stations on the air on 137 kHz 
> (relative to 5 years ago) which are strong enough to work from here in 
> JT-9.
> Last night:
> Timestamp     Call    MHz     SNR     Drift   Grid    Pwr     Reporter        
> RGrid   km      az
>   2018-11-08 00:40     EA5DOM          0.137516        -9      0       IM98xn 
>          1       DK7FC 
>   JN49ik       1395    27
>   2018-11-07 18:38     M0DSZ   0.137534        -24     0       IO82ls         
>  0.01 
>   DK7FC        JN49ik          899     110
>   2018-11-07 19:00     G8HUH   0.137430        -23     0       IO81mg         
>  0.05 
>   DK7FC        JN49ik          851     99
>   2018-11-07 09:56     F1BPT   0.137500        -21     0       JO10    1      
>  DK7FC 
>   JN49ik       427     104
>   2018-11-07 17:42     DK6NI   0.137475        -12     0       JN59ln         
>  0.001 
>   DK7FC        JN49ik          163     266
> 
> 
> This is worth to do a QSO party on LF already, but i think there are 
> even more stations such as DF6NM ready to TX.
> 
> Should we try to attempt some JT-9 QSOs on Saturday evening?
> 
> I'm not yet QRV again but could prepare things on Saturday...
> 
> 73, Stefan