Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: Receiver protection

from [DK7FC] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Receiver protection
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 15:33:24 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1531229605; bh=BJ/NvjUD2OQ5lVg5QuMYbsdTaQFfhOj3PZJizbGhsNw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=oHWdagPnfvCEejJ3bQgZquEMDQZXsOJSLbNrUY0fRb+HnH3T32Ow/pPMSiDogYWAj 7Fyg5pRcrMdOEnIhZc9hwwaKhU1D+GtyuVQ9KwnvHmb/mw8GIj+M+GpqYhHBmm1b3R pOrm2+tYzIq8ebd5Br3Z9g1TqNlsa1RFVHhXJls9kMI6nbEmQAARsBo8LI+hT7335n kXksjiX4XF646QiJeYHlEG9h3japNjup5kL3yk/M4/odJJWB45/cXyhlNkqUvtcFIV ExzzuFJ1OKZqlfxApWty1dukXTpmpT7IlMGp4gLYLqTmPLuhN/yk/Lni6Nvm48hlq8 4JE6kngm5dkzg==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 
Hi Paul,

Am 10.07.2018 15:05, schrieb N1BUG:

I am thinking they only limit peak voltage to 0.6V? If that's right,
then I think this is about +5 dBm, perhaps still enough to damage a
receiver.
Rather 1V but that should not be critical in an active E field antenna front end.
I suggest to discuss along a concrete schematic that you could present along with the question(s). 


I need to stop being lazy. ;-)
Oh oh, i know what you mean. Good point :-) I can observe the same behaviour here. Sitting in front of the monitor, watching grabbers, watching the WSPR map, programming some Linux stuff, playing with SpecLab can be quite comfortable and relaxing. When looking back, 10 years ago i have been more spontaneous in doing portable experiments. But can this tendency be stopped or is it hopeless? It could be helpful to analyse the causes instead of 'fighting' against oneselve. 


Show us your schematic, then we can contine...

73, Stefan
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: Receiver protection, N1BUG
Next by Date:  Re: LF: Receiver protection, N1BUG
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: Receiver protection, N1BUG
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: Receiver protection, N1BUG
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]