Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Pre amp *after* BPF??

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Pre amp *after* BPF??
From: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 08:13:04 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
I say BPF first, then preamp (at least for LF/MF work). Strong out
of band signals can cause all sorts of problems. Best to filter them
before amplifying. I believe the small amount of loss in a good BPF
is insignificant at low frequencies. I have found this to be true
using my LNV antenna.

http://www.n1bug.com/lfmf/LF_MF_Receiving_System.png

73,
Paul N1BUG


On 03/16/2018 07:36 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello  LF'ers,
> 
> Been  Googling and see a mixed response to should a receive pre-amp go
> before  or after a BPF. I have mine before the pre-amp, does the panel
> concur with this being correct? Thanks!
> 
> Aerial,  isolation  transformer  for  ground  loops, BPF, pre-amp, Red
> Pitaya as the LF receiver.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>