To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: WSPR-15 on 136 KHz |
From: | Alex R7NT <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:33:19 +0300 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Dpjr/NpgM1c5+Gdm2jSFVuCWnVARqA5fUWrkYZNwut4=; b=IgXtlzoyw5Kw4j0jwEdoh95XmU4hO1eM/NYAypB/fJV2ZcHadVoxLaFIB9LTNpwzhQ 2QHPNRxr3MPErxM5GAgUXXMzNsjmE+qiwIoYZu6VJqIJzNOpEuTYUhsyRrtvou75/hIB ybzlVBDlo0ifzsP5PrxAxSX81+lbM+d7o57JrrbXWEivsL+mZEp09EEM6ICqkKeNK2L7 zA6JK9bz4p0pZJpxLEl/l6CLepdrMiJTTvrwycZn5F5H9fA4jg49wUeRBCQuVKsYNPU5 eRxcTmnIAufrLoN0h5vh1tYZlYoMAaDWEucV1wDSd49kU2EIAeBB7eKf11BM5TrbADka s96Q== |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Rob,
I believe that WSPR15 is more viable on 136 at low powers (up to 1W ERP) on long QRB (compared with WSPR2) :) It's like comparing OP8 (~WSPR2) and OP32 (~WSPR32). But OP8 died a few years ago on 136 2018-02-20 15:32 GMT+03:00 Rob Renoud <[email protected]>:
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: AW: LF: Re: Wow, busy busy on 136!!, N1BUG |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: WSPR-15 on 136 KHz, DK7FC |
Previous by Thread: | LF: WSPR-15 on 136 KHz, Rob Renoud |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: WSPR-15 on 136 KHz, DK7FC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |