Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: WSPR-15 on 136 KHz

from [Alex R7NT] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: WSPR-15 on 136 KHz
From: Alex R7NT <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:33:19 +0300
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Dpjr/NpgM1c5+Gdm2jSFVuCWnVARqA5fUWrkYZNwut4=; b=IgXtlzoyw5Kw4j0jwEdoh95XmU4hO1eM/NYAypB/fJV2ZcHadVoxLaFIB9LTNpwzhQ 2QHPNRxr3MPErxM5GAgUXXMzNsjmE+qiwIoYZu6VJqIJzNOpEuTYUhsyRrtvou75/hIB ybzlVBDlo0ifzsP5PrxAxSX81+lbM+d7o57JrrbXWEivsL+mZEp09EEM6ICqkKeNK2L7 zA6JK9bz4p0pZJpxLEl/l6CLepdrMiJTTvrwycZn5F5H9fA4jg49wUeRBCQuVKsYNPU5 eRxcTmnIAufrLoN0h5vh1tYZlYoMAaDWEucV1wDSd49kU2EIAeBB7eKf11BM5TrbADka s96Q==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Rob,
I believe that WSPR15 is more viable on 136 at low powers (up to 1W ERP) on long QRB (compared with WSPR2) :)
It's like comparing OP8 (~WSPR2) and OP32 (~WSPR32). 
But OP8 died a few years ago on 136

73! Alex R7NT  136.73.ru

2018-02-20 15:32 GMT+03:00 Rob Renoud <[email protected]>:

Two T/A spots from Geoff, G0LUJ, last evening on 2200M at -35dB and -37dB show WSPR-15 to be a viable mode on 136 KHz.  I will continue nightly WSPR-15 transmissions for the next week or so.

Does anyone have an early release of WSJT-X with the slow JT9 modes included?  I believe that WSJT-X V. 0.95, r3243 released about 04/2013  may be one release that includes the slow JT9 modes.

73,
Rob - K3RWR
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: AW: LF: Re: Wow, busy busy on 136!!, N1BUG
Next by Date:  Re: LF: WSPR-15 on 136 KHz, DK7FC
Previous by Thread:  LF: WSPR-15 on 136 KHz, Rob Renoud
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: WSPR-15 on 136 KHz, DK7FC
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]